Experience
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG v. Onesta IP, LLC
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
Onesta IP, LLC
Functioned as lead counsel for BMW. After a non-practicing entity (NPE) asserted two U.S. patents in Munich, Finnegan filed a declaratory-judgment action in the Western District of Texas and obtained an ex parte temporary restraining order (TRO) as well as an anti-suit injunction barring foreign enforcement of those U.S. patents. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit dismissed Onesta’s appeal, awarded costs to BMW as prevailing party, and left the injunction intact. The case resolved with a worldwide, irrevocable covenant not to sue, covering BMW, affiliates, customers, and the accused products.
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG v. Onesta IP, LLC, 6:25-cv-00581, W.D. Tex., Judge Albright
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG v. Onesta IP, LLC, 26-1338, Fed. Cir., Judges Chen, Lourie, Stark
Omega Patents, LLC v. Bayerische Motoren Werke AG and BMW of North America, LLC
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG and BMW of North America, LLC
Finnegan defeats U.S. enforcement campaign by non-practicing entity against BMW Group
BMW of North America, LLC and Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
Sol IP, LLC v. Qualcomm Inc. et al.
Sol IP, LLC
Beacon Navigation GmbH v. Bayerische Motoren Werke AG et al.
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG et al.
Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew
Kinetic Concepts, Inc.
Lupercal LLC v. PlainsCapital Bank
PlainsCapital Bank
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Castle Retail, LLC
Castle Retail, LLC
Lochner Technologies LLC v. Toshiba America, Inc.
Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.
SAP AG
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.