Experience
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC
Castle Retail, LLC
Represents Castle Retail in patent litigation brought by Hawk Technology Systems in district court and on appeal. The district court ruled in Castle Retail’s favor, granting Castle Retail’s Rule 12 motion and invalidating Hawk’s patent claims related to video surveillance technology. On appeal the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court ruling. The district court then granted our client more than $106k in attorneys fees, finding the entirety of Finnegan’s attorneys fees to be reasonable.
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Castle Retail, LLC, 2:20-cv-02766, W.D. Tenn., Judge McCalla
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Castle Retail, LLC, 22-1222, Fed. Cir., Judges Cunningham, Hughes, Reyna
Salient Systems Corporation v. Hawk Technology Systems LLC et al.
Salient Systems Corporation
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Kirkland's Inc.
Kirkland's Inc.
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Ross Downing Buick GMC Cadillac, LLC
Ross Downing Buick GMC Cadillac, LLC
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Tyler Stonegate Property Owners Association, Inc.
Tyler Stonegate Property Owners Association, Inc.
Omega Patents LLC v. BMW of North America LLC
BMW of North America LLC
Interval Licensing LLC v. AOL, Inc.
AOL, Inc.
Lochner Technologies LLC v. Toshiba America, Inc.
Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.
NorthStar Systems LLC v. BMW et al.
BMW of North America et al.
Daedalus Blue LLC v. SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd. et al.
SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd. et al.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.