Associate
Joseph Myles focuses on patent litigation in a range of patent venues, including district courts, the Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). He leverages trial experience gained through interning at the D.C. Superior Court to represent high-tech companies through all phases of litigation.
Joseph is experienced in pre-litigation strategy, discovery, and motions practice, advising clients through the formation of patent-specific litigation positions, including infringement, validity, claim construction, and unenforceability. He drafts and oversees Patent Office challenges for petitioners and patent owners, including inter partes reviews, post-grant reviews, and ex parte reexaminations. Joseph counsels clients through the patent application process before the USPTO, including designing patent protection plans, managing large portfolios, and overseeing office action responses and examiner interviews.
Joseph drafts motions and claim construction briefing, investigates infringement and validity positions, and coordinates district court and PTAB trial strategy. He is well versed in using the 28 U.S.C. § 1782 discovery procedure to seek important litigation materials from U.S. parties for use in foreign patent infringement proceedings. He has written extensively on the uses of § 1782 discovery and participated in the formation of § 1782 practical guidance through The Sedona Conference. Joseph also assists clients with pre-litigation strategy, including drafting noninfringement opinions and investigating potential patent infringement.
Joseph oversees patent portfolios for both front end and back-end features of mobile apps, including applications of object-oriented design, HTML5 architecture, BIAN, and the Angular, Apache Kafka, and MICRON frameworks. He has secured patent protection for electronic product and service recommendation systems and bank account management systems.
Joseph is an active member of the VLSI Amicus Briefing ad hoc working group of the American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) PTAB Trial committee, and he is well-published in the area of international discovery.
1:20-cv-00510, D. Del., Judge Wolson
1:23-cv-00005, D. Del., Judge Wolson
IPR2023-00333, -00334, PTAB
22-2062 , Fed. Cir.
IPR2021-00417, -00418, -00419, PTAB, Judges Galligan, Repko, White
In the Matter of Certain Semiconductor Devices and Products Containing the Same
Achieved a comprehensive victory for respondent Innoscience, a global leader in gallium nitride (GaN) power devices, in a high-profile patent dispute before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The ITC’s Final Determination confirms that Innoscience avoided all patent claims asserted by Infineon.
337‑TA‑1414, ITC, Judge Moore
Carrum Technologies, LLC v. BMW of North America, LLC, et al.
Obtained complete victory against Carrum on appeal of the District of Delaware’s claim construction to the Federal Circuit following Carrum’s stipulation of non-infringement under the claim construction, thereby exonerating BMW’s ACC system, first sold in 2000, against Carrum’s 2004 patents. Invalidated several asserted claims through post-grant efforts before the U.S. Patent Office, including IPRs and EPRs, and pursued claims through proceedings before the Eastern District of Virginia to vindicate BMW’s patent challenges.
1:18-cv-01645, D. Del., Judge Andrews
21-1435, 24-1480, Fed. Cir., Judges Clevenger, Cunningham, Lourie, Moore, Prost, Taranto
IPR2019-00902, -00903, -00904, -00905, -00927, 00928, PTAB, Judges Browne, Scanlon, Tornquist
90/019,010, CRU
United States Automobile Association v. Truist Bank
2:22-cv-00291, E.D. Tex., Judge Gilstrap
IPR2022-01593, IPR2023-00143, -00144, -00183, -00184, -00829, PTAB, Judges Dirba, Droesch, McMillin, White, Zecher
Transcend Shipping Systems, LLC v. FedEx Corp.
2:22-cv-00110, E.D. Tex., Judges Gilstrap, Payne
Conference
2026 PTAB Bar Association Annual Conference 2026 PTAB Bar Association Annual Conference
March 18-20, 2026
Washington, DC
IP Updates
The New USPTO Streamlined Claim Set Pilot Program: A Possible Fast-Track to Issued Patents The New USPTO Streamlined Claim Set Pilot Program: A Possible Fast-Track to Issued Patents
October 27, 2025
IP Updates
USPTO Launches AI-Assisted Automated Search Tool (Automated Search Pilot Program): What Patent Counsel Need to Know USPTO Launches AI-Assisted Automated Search Tool (Automated Search Pilot Program): What Patent Counsel Need to Know
October 24, 2025
Articles
Common Ground: An Apparent Government Desire to Return Eligibility to its Roots Common Ground: An Apparent Government Desire to Return Eligibility to its Roots
October 14, 2025
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination
May 11, 2026
Press Release
BMW AG Announces Resolution of WDTX Declaratory Judgment against Onesta, Following Broad Covenant Not to Sue to BMW AG by Onesta BMW AG Announces Resolution of WDTX Declaratory Judgment against Onesta, Following Broad Covenant Not to Sue to BMW AG by Onesta
April 23, 2026
Commentary
Fed. Circ. Ends Anti-Suit Injunction Appeal in BMW Case Fed. Circ. Ends Anti-Suit Injunction Appeal in BMW Case
April 20, 2026
Law360Media Mention
Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: BMW Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: BMW
February 20, 2026
Law360Commentary
Albright Stresses IP Sovereignty in Allowing BMW Injunction Albright Stresses IP Sovereignty in Allowing BMW Injunction
February 13, 2026
Law360Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.