From autonomous cars to unmanned aerial vehicles, transportation and logistics industries are gaining traction at a racing speed. For automakers, aerospace companies, and logistics service providers, keeping up with this global pace means innovating with rapidly advancing technologies. This type of innovation can present complex legal challenges for companies looking to stay ahead of the curve. Finnegan has worked alongside visionaries in these industries for decades, helping them define markets and grow company value while they create breakthroughs in automation, safety, and efficiency.
Our full-service IP attorneys and professionals possess the right match of legal and technical experience to guide companies looking to innovate in the transportation and logistics sector. Combining scientific backgrounds with decades of IP law experience, Finnegan partners closely with clients to provide comprehensive IP legal guidance. We advise on virtually every intellectual property issue, whether it is related to patents, trademarks, copyrights, or trade secrets. Our practice comprises experienced attorneys and professionals who have an in-depth understanding of the complex legal, technical, regulatory, and business issues faced by industries innovating in the transportation and logistics space.
We help with:
Our Transportation and Logistics practice includes attorneys and professionals with degrees in relevant scientific disciplines such as chemistry, electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, and physics, as well as attorneys with extensive experience in brand management and protection. Many joined Finnegan after holding positions in industry, at universities, or as examiners with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
With aviation and space technologies integrated as irreplaceable elements of everyday life, waves of extraordinary developments are expected to continue into the near future. Navigating these developments requires a deep understanding of the many complex technologies that enable the advancements
Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) present novel challenges for businesses looking to invest in intellectual property. Protecting those investments and understanding the innovation landscape is where Finnegan comes in.
Finnegan has a long history of working with automakers and suppliers in the automotive industry building legal strategies designed to help protect, advocate, and leverage their high-value IP assets.
Obtained complete victory against Carrum on appeal of the District of Delaware’s claim construction to the Federal Circuit following Carrum’s stipulation of non-infringement under the claim construction, thereby exonerating BMW’s ACC system, first sold in 2000, against Carrum’s 2004 patents. Invalidated several asserted claims through post-grant efforts before the U.S. Patent Office, including IPRs and EPRs, and pursued claims through proceedings before the Eastern District of Virginia to vindicate BMW’s patent challenges.
1:18-cv-01645, D. Del., Judge Andrews
21-1435, 24-1480, Fed. Cir., Judges Clevenger, Cunningham, Lourie, Moore, Prost, Taranto
IPR2019-00902, -00903, -00904, -00905, -00927, 00928, PTAB, Judges Browne, Scanlon, Tornquist
90/019,010, CRU
Obtained a swift, cost-effective walk-away in the Southern District of Texas by showing that Ad Innovations’ infringement theory accused a feature not present in the U.S.
3:25-cv-00179, S.D. Tex., Judge Brown
Secured a covenant-not-to-sue and zero-dollar walkaway for BMW Group in a declaratory judgment action, concluding Arigna’s high-profile patent enforcement campaign involving current amplification technology. This outcome follows a decisive ITC victory, the dismissal of parallel District Court litigation, and multiple concurrent patent office challenges pending at the time of resolution.
1:23-cv-01190, D.D.C., Judge Contreras
2:21-cv-00173, E.D. Tex.
IPR2021-01531, PTAB, Judges Baer, Fenick, Iftikhar
23-1931, Fed. Cir.
90/019,261, USPTO
4:23-cv-02961, S.D. Tex., Judge Rosenthal
2:19-cv-01480, C.D. Cal., Judge Wu
Articles
California Reaches Record $12.75 Million CCPA Settlement with General Motors Over Driver Data
June 4, 2026
At the PTAB Blog
Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a
§ 325(d) EPR Denial
May 28, 2026
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Federal Circuit Affirms § 102(b) Invalidity; Source Code Commands Are Not Hearsay
May 14, 2026
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Federal Circuit Reverses Indefiniteness Ruling on Means-Plus-Function Claim
April 15, 2026
European IP Blog
Munich Regional Court I Grants Avago Injunction Against Renault After Calculating a FRAND Rate
4 March 2026
Press Release
BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret
June 23, 2026
Commentary
U.S. Judge Rules Forum-Selection Clause Bars Zync from Pursuing ITC Trade Secret Case
June 15, 2026
Award/Ranking
World Trademark Review Recognizes Three Finnegan Partners on its 2026 Global Leaders List
June 24, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.