Experience
Kinetic Concepts, Inc.
Smith & Nephew
Appeared at trial and argued numerous motions, including JMOL, jury charge, and evidentiary motions. Jury returned verdict for client KCI. Successfully defended jury verdict of validity on appeal.
Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, 11-1105, Fed. Cir., Judges Bryson, Dyk, O'Malley
Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, 5:08-cv-00102, W.D. Tex., Judges Furgeson, Rodriguez
Innovative Therapies, Inc. v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc.
Kinetic Concepts, Inc.
Lochner Technologies LLC v. Toshiba America, Inc.
Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.
Highmark, Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc.
Allcare Health Management System, Inc.
District court enters judgment of noninfringement for Finnegan client Philips
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. v. Cardiac Science Operating Co.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V.
Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. Affymetrix, Inc.
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
Kinetic Technologies, Inc. v. Advanced Analogic Technologies, Inc.
Kinetic Technologies, Inc.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.