By applying technology to raw materials, we transform elements into the products that support daily life and keep commerce flowing. Technical advances in manufacturing processes coupled with advances in engineering materials have led to incredible innovations across industries, from additive manufacturing to textiles, from clean energy to food products. To be competitive, companies that make physical things are market driven towards developing products that are greener, smarter, and all around better. Finnegan has worked for decades with clients contributing at all points on the supply chain, helping to protect their ideas and novel approaches for meeting consumer demands.
From companies with mass production plants to those making a bespoke item using a single machine, manufacturers must know and understand the influence of IP law on their businesses. Many of Finnegan’s professionals were trained as chemists and engineers and draw from their scientific insight as well as their legal acumen to help develop IP strategies and navigate judicial decisions impacting companies in chemical, industrial, and materials industries.
We help by:
Our Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials practice includes attorneys and professionals with degrees in relevant scientific disciplines such as chemistry, biochemistry, chemical engineering computer science, electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, materials science and engineering, and metallurgy, as well as attorneys with extensive experience in brand management and protection. Many joined Finnegan after holding positions in industry, at universities, or as examiners with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Additive manufacturing, also known as 3D printing, is a disruptive technology with far-reaching implications for manufacturers, consumers, and intellectual property owners.
Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) present novel challenges for businesses looking to invest in intellectual property. Protecting those investments and understanding the innovation landscape is where Finnegan comes in.
From basic elements to highly specialized goods, chemicals play a fundamental role in everything from the raw materials used in manufacturing to the high-tech products that allow us to communicate, travel, eat, and save lives.
Innovative technologies that produce renewable, clean, efficient, and affordable energy are paramount in the quest to solve some of the world’s most pressing challenges.
It is no surprise that food and beverage companies invest substantial resources creating new products and unique ways to package and market them. Companies must protect these investments by obtaining and protecting the underlying intellectual property rights that result from their innovation.
Manufacturing powers the world’s economy and is a large, diverse, and highly innovative sector. From farm machinery to chemicals to telecommunications and everything in between, manufacturing plays a crucial role in producing goods across all aspects of the economy.
Innovative companies are developing products with myriad applications, such as tiny batteries, nano-structured surfaces that ward off bacteria, magnetically-controlled microbots, and nanofilament-impregnated contact lenses capable of enabling an HD virtual reality or augmented reality display at a user’s eye.
The oil and gas industry is investing in advances in both upstream and downstream sectors of the industry, from exploration to field and pipeline development to refining.
From protecting vulnerable crops, helping doctors improve their patient’s lives, and monitoring your vital signs, to improving the comfort of your clothing—textiles are everywhere. Textiles comprise a broad and diverse range of products used in myriad applications.
Secured a decisive victory for client US Synthetic Corp. (USS) at the ITC. After a full hearing, the ALJ found that respondents infringed multiple claims of USS’s patent and that the claims were valid and supported by a domestic industry, but an initial Commission ruling under § 101 temporarily prevented a finding of violation of Section 337. The Federal Circuit reversed the § 101 ruling, and on remand the ITC found a violation and issued a limited exclusion order barring infringing polycrystalline diamond products from entry into the United States, securing final relief for USS.
337-TA-1236, ITC, Judge Elliot
IL-2024-000026, UK High Court
Secured a significant victory for client US Synthetic Corporation (USS) with a precedential decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) overturning an unfavorable 35 U.S.C. § 101 eligibility ruling from the International Trade Commission (ITC).
23-1217, Fed. Cir., Judges Chen, Dyk, Stoll
Articles
Unpacking Squires’ Recent Discretionary Denial Guidance Focusing on American Manufacturing
April 24, 2026
Federal Circuit IP Blog
April 22, 2026
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Federal Circuit Reverses Indefiniteness Ruling on Means-Plus-Function Claim
April 15, 2026
Announcement
Finnegan Partner Ningling Wang Becomes President of Licensing Executives Society International
May 4, 2026
Award/Ranking
April 10, 2026
Commentary
Litigation Leaders: Finnegan’s Jennifer Roscetti on the Advantages of Being Fully Focused on IP
April 6, 2026
Commentary
Squires’ Latest PTAB Memo Seeks to Boost U.S. Manufacturing with New Discretionary Factors
March 18, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Announces Six New Partners to Strengthen Global IP Leadership
January 5, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.