直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Securing $240 million and a jury verdict of willful infringement for Promptu in patent case against Comcast

Promptu Systems Corporation

Comcast Corporation et al.

Finnegan obtained a $240 million jury verdict for client Promptu in a patent infringement lawsuit against Comcast in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The jury found that Comcast infringed Promptu’s patents covering voice recognition technology for TV and further determined that the infringement was willful.


Promptu filed suit alleging that Comcast’s voice enabled television products infringed Promptu’s voice recognition patents. After an adverse claim construction ruling led to stipulated non infringement to permit appeal, Finnegan successfully appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The Federal Circuit vacated an earlier judgment and remanded the case after concluding that the district court had construed key claim terms too narrowly. The remand cleared the way for Promptu to present its infringement case to a jury, which resulted in a $240 million verdict.


After nearly a decade of litigation, this verdict vindicates Promptu’s pioneering work in voice powered TV interfaces and confirms that Comcast’s products incorporated Promptu’s patented innovations.


Finnegan’s representation of Promptu has also included earlier victories at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), where Comcast’s inter partes review (IPR) challenges failed, confirming the strength of Promptu’s patent portfolio.

Promptu Systems Corporation v. Comcast Corporation et al., 2:16-cv-06516, E.D. Pa., Sanchez

Promptu Systems Corporation v. Comcast Corporation et al., 22-1939, Fed. Cir., Judges Prost, Moore, Taranto

Related Professionals

Jacob A. Schroeder
Partner
Palo Alto, CA
+1 650 849 6765
Email
Gerald F. Ivey
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4110
Email
John M. Williamson
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4282
Email
Christopher T. Blackford
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4027
Email
Benjamin R. Schlesinger
Partner
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6416
Email
Cara E. Regan
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4315
Email
Jeffrey C. Totten
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4232
Email
Daniel F. Klodowski
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4216
Email
Sydney R. Kestle
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4241
Email
Jason L. Romrell
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4349
Email
Robert K. High
Partner
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6564
Email
Jinwoo Kim
Associate
Palo Alto, CA
+1 650 849 6664
Email
David A. Lebby
Associate
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6419
Email
Amy L. Fulton
Associate
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4438
Email
Wyatt L. Bazrod
Associate
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6518
Email
Jillian M. Baggett
Associate
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6441
Email
Jordan M. Cowger
Associate
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4137
Email
Megan L. Meyers
Associate
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6565
Email
Jason D. Tulley
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4082
Email

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology

Electrical and Computer Technology

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML)

Communications

Media

Related Experiences

Finnegan secures jury verdict of willful infringement for ProSlide

ProSlide Technology, Inc.

Jury finds non-infringement and non-willfulness in LG Electronics refrigerator patents case

LG Electronics

In one of the first willful infringement verdicts since Seagate, U.S. Philips Corporation wins over $100 million

U.S. Philips Corporation

Finnegan secures jury verdict for Philips in CD-Disc patent dispute

Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. U.S. Philips Corp.

California judge grants post-verdict injunction and willful infringement for Asetek

Asetek Danmark A/S

Finnegan obtains jury verdict of non-infringement for longtime client FedEx

FedEx Corp.

Reversal of a $46 million judgment against a world leader in personal care, Conair

Conair

LG Electronics protected against monopolization and attempted monopolization claims and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act claims in patent infringement case

LG Electronics

A reversal of a $70+ million judgment against Mattel and popular “Hot Wheels” toys

Mattel

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP