直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Finnegan secures jury verdict of willful infringement for ProSlide

ProSlide Technology, Inc.

WhiteWater West Industries, Ltd.

After a nine-day jury trial in the Middle District of Florida, Finnegan client ProSlide Technology, Inc. prevailed in an infringement case involving patents related to large water slides. ProSlide, a manufacturer of water slides for amusement parks and water parks, accused three WhiteWater West Industries, Inc. rides—the “Orbiter,” the “Tailspin,” and the “AquaSphere,”—of willfully infringing two utility patents, and a fourth ride, the “Parallel Pursuit” of infringing a design patent. The Finnegan team successfully convinced the jury that WhiteWater’s products were infringing. The jury ruled in favor of ProSlide, finding willful infringement by the “Orbiter” and “Tailspin,” infringement by the “AquaSphere,” all patents valid, and monetary damages. Post-trial, a permanent injunction was obtained that excluded the competitor’s infringing products from the U.S. market.

ProSlide Technology, Inc. v. WhiteWater West Industries, Ltd., 6:20-cv-02189, M.D. Fla., Judge Mendoza

Related Professionals

Elizabeth D. Ferrill
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4445
Email
James R. Barney
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4412
Email
Sonja W. Sahlsten
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4329
Email
Anthony J. Berlenbach
Associate
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4135
Email

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

Prosecution and Portfolio Management

Design Rights

Related Industries

Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials

Manufacturing

Related Experiences

Securing $240 million and a jury verdict of willful infringement for Promptu in patent case against Comcast

Promptu Systems Corporation

District court grants summary judgment of noninfringement for Finnegan client Toyota against Solomon Technologies, Inc.

Toyota Motor Corp.

Finnegan secures jury verdict for Philips in CD-Disc patent dispute

Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. U.S. Philips Corp.

California judge grants post-verdict injunction and willful infringement for Asetek

Asetek Danmark A/S

Finnegan obtains jury verdict of non-infringement for longtime client FedEx

FedEx Corp.

Electronic Receipts Delivery System, LLC v. Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Fidelity National Information Services

Finnegan secures strategic damages award for Under Armour in trademark infringement litigation

Under Armour

Finnegan client successfully uses CBM to invalidate a competitor’s patents

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.; Metavante Corporation

Auth Token LLC v. Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP