Associate
Jinwoo Kim utilizes his extensive industry experience to represent clients across a diverse range of patent protection and enforcement matters related to semiconductors, electrical and computer technologies, and medical devices. He focuses on several areas of patent law, including patent litigation, patent prosecution, and post-grant proceedings before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
Jinwoo's technical experience covers a wide range of industries with a particular focus in electrical engineering and computer technology, including microprocessor and memory sub-system architecture, high-performance multi-core computer design, low-power mobile processor, computer software, communication systems, network controller, analog and mixed-signal circuit design, quantum computing, semiconductor design and manufacturing, and medical devices.
Prior to law school, Jinwoo worked for more than ten years as an electrical engineer in Silicon Valley at various companies, including Intel and Qualcomm. He led a design team developing a high-performance on-chip interconnect and memory sub-system for Intel's Xeon processor. He also worked on Qualcomm's Snapdragon mobile processor design project. Jinwoo is a co-inventor of two U.S. patents.
Promptu Systems Corporation v. Comcast Corporation
Obtained a $240 million jury verdict for client Promptu in a patent infringement lawsuit against Comcast. The jury found that Comcast willfully infringed Promptu’s patents covering voice recognition technology for TV.
2:16-cv-06516, E.D. Pa., Judge Sanchez
22-1939, Fed. Cir., Judges Prost, Moore, Taranto
Promethean Limited v. FlatFrog Laboratories AB
Represented FlatFrog Laboratories AB in bringing claims of patent infringement against Promethean Limited and Promethean Incorporated, including defending against related petitions for inter partes review (IPR).
1:19-cv-02246, D. Del., Judge Noreika
IPR2022-00061, IPR2022-00065, PTAB, Judges Stephens, Baer, Khan
337-TA-1222, ITC, Judge Shaw
Certain Capacitive Touch-Controlled Mobile Devices, Computer, and Components Thereof
337-TA-1193, ITC, Judge Elliot
Advanced Aerodynamics, LLC v. DJI Technology, Inc.
Successfully represented DJI in a patent litigation involving drone technology. Exposed serious flaws in plaintiff’s infringement allegations, driving a voluntary dismissal and a complete walk away for DJI.
2:19-cv-09705, C.D. Cal., Judge Gutierrez
Iridex Corp. v. Quantel Medical, SA
Represented Quantel Medical, S.A., Quantel USA, Inc., and Quantel, S.A. against allegations of patent infringement, breach of contract, and trademark infringement by Iridex Corporation.
3:18-cv-00153, N.D. Cal., Judge Seeborg
Articles
IP Issues With AI Code Generators IP Issues With AI Code Generators
January 11, 2023
Bloomberg LawIP Updates
Drafting and Enforcing Semiconductor Patents Drafting and Enforcing Semiconductor Patents
January 8, 2019
Commentary
CBP Clears Redesigned Innoscience Chips After ITC Case CBP Clears Redesigned Innoscience Chips After ITC Case
March 12, 2026
Law360Media Mention
Comcast Hit With $240M Verdict in Voice Recognition IP Trial Comcast Hit With $240M Verdict in Voice Recognition IP Trial
January 27, 2026
Law360Announcement
Finnegan Announces 2021 Mentors of the Year Finnegan Announces 2021 Mentors of the Year
December 28, 2021
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.