直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Firm
  • Offices
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • Advertising
    • Copyright
    • Design Rights
    • European, German, and UK IP Law
    • Export Control
    • Patent Litigation
    • Patent Office Examinations
    • Patent Portfolio Management, Monetization, and Transactions
    • Post-Grant Proceedings
    • Trademark
    • Trade Secrets
    • Blockchain, NFTs, and Other Digital Assets
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Electronics and Information Technology
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

LG Electronics protected against monopolization and attempted monopolization claims and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act claims in patent infringement case

LG Electronics

Iridian Technologies

Finnegan represented an LG Electronics (“LGE”) subsidiary involved in iris recognition technology in a patent infringement case. The patentee accused LGE of violating a license agreement, misappropriating trade secrets, and infringing the patentee’s U.S. patents. Both sides filed antitrust and unfair competition counterclaims. The patentee also filed foreign corrupt practices act claims after losing several large foreign public tenders involving the technology to LGE. Finnegan was lead counsel on both the intellectual property (patent and trade secret) and the antitrust and unfair competition claims, and secured an extremely favorable resolution of all claims, enabling LGE to purchase the critical software and continue using the underlying technology.

LG Electronics v. Iridian Technologies, 2:04-cv-00391, D.N.J., Judges Arleo, Wigenton

Related Professionals

Patrick_Coyne
Patrick J. Coyne
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4470
Email

Related Experiences

MRIS protected against collusion and monopolization claims

Metropolitan Regional Information Systems, Inc.

Jury finds non-infringement and non-willfulness in LG Electronics refrigerator patents case

LG Electronics

Hillman protected against monopolization claims

The Hillman Group

Finnegan client Elan protected against antitrust claims based on ANDA settlement

Elan Corporation PLC

Patent infringement claims against FedEx dismissed

FedEx Corp.

REC Software USA, Inc. v. LG Electronics USA, Inc.

LG Electronics USA, Inc.

Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. LG Electronics, Inc.

LG Electronics, Inc.

Uniloc 2017 LLC v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., et al.

LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., et al.

Jury finds LG’s patents valid and infringed

LG Electronics

Due to international data regulations, we’ve recently updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

The Finnegan UPC Hub is a one-stop shop for our insights related to the Unified Patent Court (UPC).

Finnegan
Click Here
  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • EEO Statement

© 2023 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP