直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

LG Electronics protected against monopolization and attempted monopolization claims and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act claims in patent infringement case

LG Electronics

Iridian Technologies

Finnegan represented an LG Electronics (“LGE”) subsidiary involved in iris recognition technology in a patent infringement case. The patentee accused LGE of violating a license agreement, misappropriating trade secrets, and infringing the patentee’s U.S. patents. Both sides filed antitrust and unfair competition counterclaims. The patentee also filed foreign corrupt practices act claims after losing several large foreign public tenders involving the technology to LGE. Finnegan was lead counsel on both the intellectual property (patent and trade secret) and the antitrust and unfair competition claims, and secured an extremely favorable resolution of all claims, enabling LGE to purchase the critical software and continue using the underlying technology.

LG Electronics v. Iridian Technologies, 2:04-cv-00391, D.N.J., Judges Arleo, Wigenton

Related Practices

Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions

Licensing, Pooling, and Other Transactions

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Antitrust and Misuse

Prosecution and Portfolio Management

Trade Secrets

Related Industries

Electrical and Computer Technology

Related Experiences

MRIS protected against collusion and monopolization claims

Metropolitan Regional Information Systems, Inc.

Jury finds non-infringement and non-willfulness in LG Electronics refrigerator patents case

LG Electronics

Hillman protected against monopolization claims

The Hillman Group

Patent infringement claims against FedEx dismissed

FedEx Corp.

Finnegan client Elan protected against antitrust claims based on ANDA settlement

Elan Corporation PLC

REC Software USA, Inc. v. LG Electronics USA, Inc.

LG Electronics USA, Inc.

Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. LG Electronics, Inc.

LG Electronics, Inc.

Uniloc 2017 LLC v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., et al.

LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., et al.

Securing $240 million and a jury verdict of willful infringement for Promptu in patent case against Comcast

Promptu Systems Corporation

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP