Associate
Wyatt Bazrod's practice encompasses both patent litigation and patent prosecution. His dedication to the field of intellectual property originates from his commitment to preserve the spirit of innovation based on his background in industrial and systems engineering. He has experience in a breadth of technologies, including aviation, information technology, and electronic devices.
Wyatt is experienced in preparing patent applications and prosecuting them before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). He has also been involved in appeals before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and litigation matters before U.S. district courts.
During law school, Wyatt served as a judicial intern at the Northern District of Georgia. He also served on Georgia State University's Moot Court executive board and coached a team through the Giles Sutherland Rich Moot Court competition. While an undergraduate, Wyatt worked for a world leader in aerospace design and manufacturing as well as one of the major U.S. airlines, further advancing his knowledge and expertise of the aviation market.
Wyatt has been recognized on the Capital Pro Bono High Honor Roll.
Promptu Systems Corporation v. Comcast Corporation
Obtained a $240 million jury verdict for client Promptu in a patent infringement lawsuit against Comcast. The jury found that Comcast willfully infringed Promptu’s patents covering voice recognition technology for TV.
2:16-cv-06516, E.D. Pa., Judge Sanchez
22-1939, Fed. Cir., Judges Prost, Moore, Taranto
BMW of North America, LLC and Bayerische Motoren Werke AG v. Arigna Technology Ltd.
Secured a covenant-not-to-sue and zero-dollar walkaway for BMW Group in a declaratory judgment action, concluding Arigna’s high-profile patent enforcement campaign involving current amplification technology. This outcome follows a decisive ITC victory, the dismissal of parallel District Court litigation, and multiple concurrent patent office challenges pending at the time of resolution.
1:23-cv-01190, D.D.C., Judge Contreras
2:21-cv-00173, E.D. Tex.
IPR2021-01531, PTAB, Judges Baer, Fenick, Iftikhar
23-1931, Fed. Cir.
90/019,261, USPTO
Federal Circuit IP Blog
“2” Does Not Provide Written Description Support for “1”: Federal Circuit Affirms District Court’s Invalidation of Patent “2” Does Not Provide Written Description Support for “1”: Federal Circuit Affirms District Court’s Invalidation of Patent
July 8, 2026
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Federal Circuit Holds Defend Trade Secrets Act Claim Untimely Filed Federal Circuit Holds Defend Trade Secrets Act Claim Untimely Filed
June 22, 2026
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Federal Circuit Affirms District Court’s Invalidation of Patents Because Inventorship Could Not Be Corrected Without Giving All Inventors Notice and an Opportunity to Be Heard Federal Circuit Affirms District Court’s Invalidation of Patents Because Inventorship Could Not Be Corrected Without Giving All Inventors Notice and an Opportunity to Be Heard
April 22, 2026
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Federal Circuit: Unaccused Products “Tethered” to Infringement Can Be Used to Calculate Damages Federal Circuit: Unaccused Products “Tethered” to Infringement Can Be Used to Calculate Damages
March 26, 2026
Media Mention
Comcast Hit With $240M Verdict in Voice Recognition IP Trial Comcast Hit With $240M Verdict in Voice Recognition IP Trial
January 27, 2026
Law360Award/Ranking
56 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2024 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll 56 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2024 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll
April 24, 2025
DC BarPress Release
BMW Group Secures Major Victory Against Patent Monetization Firm Affiliate in Protracted Patent Dispute BMW Group Secures Major Victory Against Patent Monetization Firm Affiliate in Protracted Patent Dispute
September 11, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.