上诉、争议和法律策略
About
知识产权上诉需要对细节一丝不苟。这需要律师对法律和事实有透彻的了解，以找出最有希望的一两个关键论据来说服上诉法官专家组。飞翰以高质量的辩护书和口头辩论著称。我们深知上诉过程一般在实际提出上诉之前就已经开始。我们的上诉律师兼具创造性的法律思维和熟练的写作手法，他们与庭审团队合作，制定法律策略，撰写能获胜的简报，并合理地维护上诉争议。
业务范围
Appeals from the PTAB
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decisions are appealed directly to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, where Finnegan attorneys have briefed and argued hundreds of cases.
联邦巡回法院和最高法院上诉
上诉需要细致入微地关注相关细节，要求律师对上诉法有透彻的了解，以找出最有希望的一两个关键论据并加以利用。
欧洲专利异议和上诉
欧洲专利局(EPO)的异议程序为第三方提供了在欧洲专利授权后的一段有限的时间内，在欧洲专利局集中攻击攻击欧洲专利的机会。
我们的欧洲专利律师在欧洲专利局(EPO)的异议部和各种上诉委员会都有丰富的经验。
经验
Obtained a $240 million jury verdict for client Promptu in a patent infringement lawsuit against Comcast. The jury found that Comcast willfully infringed Promptu’s patents covering voice recognition technology for TV.
2:16-cv-06516, E.D. Pa., Judge Sanchez
22-1939, Fed. Cir., Judges Prost, Moore, Taranto
Obtained complete victory against Carrum on appeal of the District of Delaware’s claim construction to the Federal Circuit following Carrum’s stipulation of non-infringement under the claim construction, thereby exonerating BMW’s ACC system, first sold in 2000, against Carrum’s 2004 patents. Invalidated several asserted claims through post-grant efforts before the U.S. Patent Office, including IPRs and EPRs, and pursued claims through proceedings before the Eastern District of Virginia to vindicate BMW’s patent challenges.
1:18-cv-01645, D. Del., Judge Andrews
21-1435, 24-1480, Fed. Cir., Judges Clevenger, Cunningham, Lourie, Moore, Prost, Taranto
IPR2019-00902, -00903, -00904, -00905, -00927, 00928, PTAB, Judges Browne, Scanlon, Tornquist
90/019,010, CRU
Finnegan represented Bausch & Lomb’s licensee Eye Therapies, LLC in an appeal at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit from a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) decision finding Eye Therapies’ patent directed to a low-dose brimonidine treatment for eye redness (Lumify®) to be unpatentable. In a precedential decision, the Federal Circuit agreed with Finnegan’s arguments and found that the Board had wrongly invalidated the patent based on an incorrect claim construction, vacating and remanding the case back to the PTAB. The proceeding settled shortly thereafter
23-2173, Fed. Cir., Judges Taranto, Stoll, Scarsi
Secured a significant victory for client US Synthetic Corporation (USS) with a precedential decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) overturning an unfavorable 35 U.S.C. § 101 eligibility ruling from the International Trade Commission (ITC).
23-1217, Fed. Cir., Judges Chen, Dyk, Stoll
Secured a covenant-not-to-sue and zero-dollar walkaway for BMW Group in a declaratory judgment action, concluding Arigna’s high-profile patent enforcement campaign involving current amplification technology. This outcome follows a decisive ITC victory, the dismissal of parallel District Court litigation, and multiple concurrent patent office challenges pending at the time of resolution.
1:23-cv-01190, D.D.C., Judge Contreras
2:21-cv-00173, E.D. Tex.
IPR2021-01531, PTAB, Judges Baer, Fenick, Iftikhar
23-1931, Fed. Cir.
90/019,261, USPTO
In a rare rehearing proceeding, successfully represented petitioner Incyte in an inter partes review (IPR) challenging the validity of Concert’s patent before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Continued representation of appellee Incyte before the Federal Circuit and secured a unanimous affirmance of the PTAB’s obviousness determination.
IPR2017-01256, PTAB, Judges Fitzpatrick, Hulse, Yang, Smith, Franklin
19-2011, Fed. Cir., Judges Hughs, Linn, Stark
