直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Fed. Circ. Overrules Precedent on Veteran Hiring Protections

August 14, 2026

Law360

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting en banc, ruled in favor of Finnegan client David Brimer, that veterans who are already federal employees may still be entitled to protections under the Veterans Employment Opportunities Act (VEOA) when applying for promotions that are also open to outside candidates. In doing so, the court overruled part of its 2015 decision in Kerner v. Department of the Interior.

The case arose after the U.S. Navy rejected David Brimer’s application for a promotion based on the mistaken belief that he had failed to submit required documents. Although the Navy later reviewed his application, it did so after selecting another candidate. Brimer challenged the decision, arguing that the Navy denied him the opportunity to compete for the position and violated his veterans’ preference rights.

The Federal Circuit agreed that the plain language of the statute does not limit its protections to veterans who are new to federal service. The court held that eligible veterans may not be denied the opportunity to compete for positions when an agency accepts applications from outside its workforce, regardless of whether the veteran is already employed by the federal government. The court remanded the case for further proceedings.

Finnegan partner Dan Cooley told Law360 that he was pleased with the Federal Circuit’s en banc decision.

"By overruling its prior precedent, the court restored to veterans like Mr. Brimer the opportunity to compete on a level playing field for federal employment and reaffirmed the protections Congress enacted on their behalf," Dan said.

Read “Fed. Circ. Overrules Precedent on Veteran Hiring Protections”

Tags

pro bono

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Related Offices

Reston, VA

Related Professionals

Daniel C. Cooley
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2778
Email

Related News

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Climbs Two Spots on The American Lawyer’s 2026: A-List Runners Up

August 12, 2026

Award/Ranking

Partner Jeffrey M. Jacobstein Named Finalist for New England Legal Awards

August 10, 2026

Commentary

Q&A: What the 'GenAI Boom' Means for Patents

August 6, 2026

Press Release

BMW Secures Landmark ITC Victory: ALJ Terminates Zync Investigation Based on Forum-Selection Clause

July 29, 2026

Press Release

Ninth Circuit Denies Zync’s Emergency Motion to Stay; BMW’s Preliminary Injunction Remains in Full Effect as Zync Moves to Stay ITC Proceedings

July 24, 2026

Commentary

SCOTUS to Rule on Pepsi Win, Trademark Enforcement Changes Could Follow

July 13, 2026

Commentary

Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects

June 30, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP