直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Finnegan Team Secures $240M Jury Verdict After PTAB Success

February 3, 2026

Managing Intellectual Property

Managing IP profiled Finnegan’s recent $240 million jury victory for Promptu Systems in its long‑running patent infringement case against Comcast. A Pennsylvania federal jury found that Comcast willfully infringed Promptu’s voice‑recognition patents, marking the culmination of nearly a decade of litigation that included eight failed PTAB challenges and a successful Federal Circuit appeal correcting overly restrictive claim constructions.

In the interview, Finnegan partner Jacob Schroeder, who represented Promptu, described how the team approached the case. He explained, “We prepared for the trial as we do in every trial. We assembled an extraordinary team of capable partners and associates who worked together as a team to identify our core themes and divided those responsibilities among the team on both an issue-by-issue basis and a witness-by-witness basis.” Jacob emphasized the team’s cohesion, noting that they “were closely coordinated on any strategy that would impact the case so that each team member knew their role, knew how their part fitted into the broader case, and was aware of the testimony and evidence needed for other aspects of the case.”

He also underscored Finnegan’s client‑first approach, stating that “our focus has always been on obtaining the best objective for our clients on the matters they trust us to handle for them,” and that the verdict “proved that we were on the right side of the law and that we pursued a sound strategy.”

Reflecting on challenges, Jacob noted that “one of the most significant challenges involved the passage of time,” including the loss of a company co‑founder and the need to show the jury that Promptu “never slept on its rights.” He credited early engineers and executives whose testimony helped convey the company’s story and the significance of its foundational patents.

Even with the complexities of a long‑running case, Jacob said the team’s preparation allowed them to “pressure test our overall theme and theory of the case and to fine‑tune the specific presentations we needed to advance at trial.” Looking ahead, he confirmed that “we still have post‑trial motions to prepare, as well as the inevitable appeal.”

The Finnegan team included Jacob Schroeder, Gerald Ivey, John Williamson, Christopher Blackford, Benjamin Schlesinger, Cara Regan, Jeffrey Totten, and Daniel Klodowski.

Read Finnegan team secures $240m jury verdict after PTAB success

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology

Electrical and Computer Technology

Communications

Media

Consumer Goods and Services

Consumer Products

Related Offices

Atlanta, GA

Palo Alto, CA

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Jacob A. Schroeder
Partner
Palo Alto, CA
+1 650 849 6765
Email
Gerald F. Ivey
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4110
Email
John M. Williamson
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4282
Email
Christopher T. Blackford
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4027
Email
Benjamin R. Schlesinger
Partner
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6416
Email
Cara E. Regan
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4315
Email
Jeffrey C. Totten
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4232
Email
Daniel F. Klodowski
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4216
Email

Related News

Commentary

Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects

June 30, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings

June 25, 2026

Commentary

Zync Fights Block of ITC Trade Secret Case Against BMW

June 24, 2026

Commentary

BMW Secures Injunction Forcing Zync to Seek Stay of ITC Trade Secret Case

June 23, 2026

Press Release

BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret

June 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Recognized in 2026 BTI Client Service A-Team Rankings

June 22, 2026

Award/Ranking

Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers

June 22, 2026

Commentary

U.S. Judge Rules Forum-Selection Clause Bars Zync from Pursuing ITC Trade Secret Case

June 15, 2026

Commentary

Finnegan Taps Partner from Kirkland to Boost IP Team

June 12, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP