直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Finnegan Team Secures $240M Jury Verdict After PTAB Success

February 3, 2026

Managing Intellectual Property

Managing IP profiled Finnegan’s recent $240 million jury victory for Promptu Systems in its long‑running patent infringement case against Comcast. A Pennsylvania federal jury found that Comcast willfully infringed Promptu’s voice‑recognition patents, marking the culmination of nearly a decade of litigation that included eight failed PTAB challenges and a successful Federal Circuit appeal correcting overly restrictive claim constructions.

In the interview, Finnegan partner Jacob Schroeder, who represented Promptu, described how the team approached the case. He explained, “We prepared for the trial as we do in every trial. We assembled an extraordinary team of capable partners and associates who worked together as a team to identify our core themes and divided those responsibilities among the team on both an issue-by-issue basis and a witness-by-witness basis.” Jacob emphasized the team’s cohesion, noting that they “were closely coordinated on any strategy that would impact the case so that each team member knew their role, knew how their part fitted into the broader case, and was aware of the testimony and evidence needed for other aspects of the case.”

He also underscored Finnegan’s client‑first approach, stating that “our focus has always been on obtaining the best objective for our clients on the matters they trust us to handle for them,” and that the verdict “proved that we were on the right side of the law and that we pursued a sound strategy.”

Reflecting on challenges, Jacob noted that “one of the most significant challenges involved the passage of time,” including the loss of a company co‑founder and the need to show the jury that Promptu “never slept on its rights.” He credited early engineers and executives whose testimony helped convey the company’s story and the significance of its foundational patents.

Even with the complexities of a long‑running case, Jacob said the team’s preparation allowed them to “pressure test our overall theme and theory of the case and to fine‑tune the specific presentations we needed to advance at trial.” Looking ahead, he confirmed that “we still have post‑trial motions to prepare, as well as the inevitable appeal.”

The Finnegan team included Jacob Schroeder, Gerald Ivey, John Williamson, Christopher Blackford, Benjamin Schlesinger, Cara Regan, Jeffrey Totten, and Daniel Klodowski.

Read Finnegan team secures $240m jury verdict after PTAB success

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology

Electrical and Computer Technology

Communications

Media

Consumer Goods and Services

Consumer Products

Related Offices

Atlanta, GA

Palo Alto, CA

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Jacob A. Schroeder
Partner
Palo Alto, CA
+1 650 849 6765
Email
Gerald F. Ivey
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4110
Email
John M. Williamson
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4282
Email
Christopher T. Blackford
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4027
Email
Benjamin R. Schlesinger
Partner
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6416
Email
Cara E. Regan
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4315
Email
Jeffrey C. Totten
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4232
Email
Daniel F. Klodowski
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4216
Email

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Summary Determination of No Violation in ITC Vehicle Space Guards Investigation for Drop Stop

October 6, 2026

Commentary

Catching Up with Hope Shimabuku

September 29, 2026

Commentary

Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool

September 25, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027

September 24, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Commentary

New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret

September 21, 2026

Commentary

Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say

September 17, 2026

Commentary

Jellycat’s ‘Dupe’ Dilemma: Can IP Protect a ‘Cute’ Aesthetic?

September 16, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP