直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

MLex

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office denied Jiaxing Super Lighting Electric Appliance Co.'s request for ex parte reexamination of an LED lighting technology patent owned by Finnegan client Xiamen PVTECH Corp, finding no substantial new question of patentability (SNQ) after PVTECH submitted a preorder filing outlining its argument. The decision is an early example of a patent owner that has overcome such a challenge via the office’s new preorder filing process.

Finnegan partner Lionel Lavenue said in a statement to MLex that the decision is "an important early result" under the new preorder procedure.

"The preorder process gave PVTECH an opportunity to explain at the outset why Super Lighting's request failed to raise a substantial new question of patentability. The USPTO agreed and declined to order reexamination," he said. "We will continue to vigorously defend PVTECH's patent rights before the USPTO and enforce those rights in the Eastern District of Texas."

Read “Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial”

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

Ex Parte Reexamination (EPR)

Related Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology

Electronic Devices and Components

Related Offices

Reston, VA

Related Professionals

Lionel M. Lavenue
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2750
Email

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Summary Determination of No Violation in ITC Vehicle Space Guards Investigation for Drop Stop

October 6, 2026

Commentary

Catching Up with Hope Shimabuku

September 29, 2026

Commentary

Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool

September 25, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Commentary

New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret

September 21, 2026

Commentary

Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say

September 17, 2026

Commentary

Jellycat’s ‘Dupe’ Dilemma: Can IP Protect a ‘Cute’ Aesthetic?

September 16, 2026

Commentary

Bloomberg Law Q&A with Finnegan IP Lawyer Christian Hurt

September 11, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP