直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Daily Journal

Nearly a decade after a Supreme Court decision appeared to curb the Eastern District of Texas's dominance in patent litigation, the court has reemerged as the nation's busiest venue for patent infringement disputes.

The TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC ruling reshaped the patent litigation landscape by making it more difficult for plaintiffs to sue companies outside their home jurisdictions. As a result, filings in the Eastern District of Texas dropped sharply, with the court's share of patent cases falling from more than 40% to just 10% within a few years.

That decline has proven temporary. Companies with significant operations in East Texas remain vulnerable to being sued there, and recent changes in the Western District of Texas have reduced the appeal of that venue for patent plaintiffs. Together, those factors have helped channel patent litigation back to the Eastern District.

Lex Machina reports that new patent infringement filings in the district surged to 1,245 in 2025, nearly double the number filed two years earlier and more than the combined totals of the Western District of Texas and the District of Delaware, the country's next most active patent venues.

Although patent filings increased nationwide last year, activity has cooled somewhat in 2026. Still, Finnegan Managing Partner James Barney told the Daily Journal that companies with a substantial presence in the Eastern District of Texas are unlikely to persuade courts to move cases elsewhere.

James added that he continues to expect patent litigation activity to grow, though perhaps not as quickly as some anticipated. "I have not seen as much as I would have predicted," he said. "It doesn't look like we have seen a giant surge. It may be yet to come."

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

Related Professionals

James R. Barney
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4412
Email

Related News

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Award/Ranking

Fourteen Finnegan Attorneys Named to the 2026 IAM Strategy 300 List

August 13, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP