直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Press Release

Finnegan Achieves Massive CBP Victory for Innoscience, Capping a Series of Decisive Wins Against EPC

February 24, 2026

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
February 24, 2026

WASHINGTON, DC–Finnegan is pleased to announce that the firm has achieved a massive victory for firm client Innoscience before U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), securing a ruling confirming that Innoscience’s new generation gallium nitride (GaN) power products are not subject to the Limited Exclusion Order (LEO) issued by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) in Investigation No. 337‑TA‑1366.

The CBP ruling, issued on February 20, 2026, confirms that Innoscience may make, use, sell, offer for sale, and import its new generation products into the United States without restriction, restoring full access to the U.S. market.

This ruling marks the third major win Finnegan has delivered for Innoscience in its dispute with Efficient Power Conversion Corporation (EPC) and reflects Finnegan’s aggressive, coordinated, and forward‑looking multi‑forum strategy to defeat EPC’s claims and protect Innoscience’s business.

A Series of Strategic Wins for Innoscience

First Win – ITC Investigation
In the ITC investigation initiated by EPC in May 2023, Finnegan successfully dismantled the majority of EPC’s case. The Finnegan team compelled EPC to withdraw two of the four asserted patents and secured a determination that a third patent was not infringed. As a result, EPC’s case was reduced to a single patent—U.S. Patent No. 8,350,294 (the ’294 patent)—and only two claims, on which the ITC issued the LEO.

Second Win – USPTO Invalidity Decision
But the ’294 patent was soon destroyed by Finnegan at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Exercising foresight and strategic vision, Finnegan filed an inter partes review (IPR) challenging the’294 patent early in the dispute. Just months after the ITC’s final determination, the USPTO issued a final written decision holding all claims of the ’294 patent invalid, eliminating the entire legal foundation of EPC’s remaining infringement allegations and delivering a timely, business‑critical victory for Innoscience.

Third Win – CBP Ruling
Although the LEO remains in place during the pendency of appeals of the ITC and IPR decisions, Finnegan moved swiftly to mitigate its business impact. Finnegan advised Innoscience to develop a new generation of GaN products that, under the ITC’s own infringement analysis, do not infringe the ’294 patent, and sought an administrative ruling from CBP confirming that these products fall outside the scope of the LEO. CBP’s February 20 decision confirmed Finnegan’s analysis and cleared the way for unrestricted U.S. imports and sales.

“This is a decisive win for Innoscience,” said Lionel Lavenue, Finnegan partner and lead counsel for Innoscience. “Through a deliberate and aggressive multi‑forum strategy, we defeated EPC’s claims piece by piece and delivered a result that protects Innoscience both legally and commercially.”

Decisive Legal and Business Victory — With More to Come

The CBP ruling ensures that Innoscience’s business is not disrupted by EPC’s claims and restores access to its high‑performance, cost‑effective GaN power solutions for U.S. customers, including in applications such as AI data centers, robotics, solar micro inverters, and EV onboard charging.

Appeals of both the ITC’s determination and the USPTO’s invalidity decision are underway. Finnegan expects additional favorable outcomes that will permanently resolve the remaining issues and eliminate the exclusion order in its entirety.

“This case shows what is possible when ITC litigation, USPTO proceedings, and CBP review are coordinated with a clear business objective,” Lionel added. “And this story on the many successes of Innoscience is not even over – there’s more to come.”

The case is Certain Semiconductor Devices, and Methods of Manufacturing Same and Products Containing the Same, Investigation No. 337-TA-1366 (U.S. International Trade Commission).

 

Contacts
 
Terra Liddell, Chief Marketing Officer
terra.liddell@finnegan.com

Angela Robinson, Director of Branding and Communications
angela.robinson@finnegan.com


About Finnegan
When your most valuable assets are ideas, innovation, and brand—you need the best to protect them. Finnegan, a premier intellectual property law firm, is trusted by global leaders to protect and advance what sets them apart. With 11 offices across the globe, we bring local insight and global reach to every IP challenge. We are located in Atlanta, Boston, London, Munich, Palo Alto, Reston, Seoul, Shanghai, Taipei, Tokyo and Washington, DC. From high-stakes litigation to cutting-edge patent strategy and innovative brand management, we deliver unmatched depth, agility, and results. If it is IP, it is Finnegan. Please visit us at www.finnegan.com or follow us on LinkedIn to see how we’re shaping the future of IP, one breakthrough at a time.

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

ITC Section 337 Investigations and Trials

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology

Electronic Devices and Components

Related Offices

Reston, VA

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Lionel M. Lavenue
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2750
Email
Smith R. Brittingham
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4158
Email
Carlos E. Duarte-Guevara, Ph.D.
Associate
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 6013
Email
Michael J. McLaughlin
Associate
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4220
Email
Alvin (Keyi) Xu
Associate
Shanghai
+86 21 6194 2068
Email
Chen Zang, Ph.D.
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4416
Email

Related News

Commentary

Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects

June 30, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings

June 25, 2026

Commentary

Zync Fights Block of ITC Trade Secret Case Against BMW

June 24, 2026

Press Release

BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret

June 23, 2026

Commentary

BMW Secures Injunction Forcing Zync to Seek Stay of ITC Trade Secret Case

June 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Recognized in 2026 BTI Client Service A-Team Rankings

June 22, 2026

Award/Ranking

Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers

June 22, 2026

Commentary

U.S. Judge Rules Forum-Selection Clause Bars Zync from Pursuing ITC Trade Secret Case

June 15, 2026

Commentary

Finnegan Taps Partner from Kirkland to Boost IP Team

June 12, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP