Associate
Carlos Duarte-Guevara, Ph.D., represents clients ranging from emerging companies to established industry leaders in intellectual property (IP) matters involving complex technologies, with a particular focus on semiconductors and artificial intelligence (AI). His practice includes litigating IP disputes in federal district courts, before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), and in arbitration proceedings; counseling clients on global IP portfolio strategy; and prosecuting patent applications.
Carlos’s litigation experience spans all phases of IP disputes, from pre-suit investigations through post-trial proceedings. He works with clients to develop technically rigorous case strategies designed to drive favorable outcomes, including negotiated resolutions, invalidity positions, and noninfringement defenses.
Carlos advises clients on comprehensive IP portfolio strategies and on assessing IP-related risks and opportunities. He has worked with companies across a range of technologies, including semiconductors, microfluidics, consumer electronics, 3D printing, and microelectromechanical systems, helping them strengthen and align their IP portfolios with business objectives.
In patent prosecution, Carlos has experience developing and managing portfolios involving electronic technologies, including semiconductor devices, integrated circuit design, wireless systems, microelectromechanical systems, as well as computer-implemented technologies, such as AI systems, audio and video processing, data visualization, and graphical user interfaces.
Before joining Finnegan, Carlos worked in the technology transfer office at the University of Illinois. He also has hands-on experience in semiconductor manufacturing. As an inventor himself, Carlos brings a practical understanding of inventor priorities, technology commercialization, and the strategic considerations that shape in-house counsel decision-making.
Carlos leads Finnegan’s Hispanic affinity group. His pro bono work includes assisting asylum seekers in immigration court through Human Rights First.
In the Matter of Certain Semiconductor Devices and Products Containing the Same
Achieved a comprehensive victory for respondent Innoscience, a global leader in gallium nitride (GaN) power devices, in a high-profile patent dispute before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The ITC’s Final Determination confirms that Innoscience avoided all patent claims asserted by Infineon.
337‑TA‑1414, ITC, Judge Moore
Pavemetrics Systems., Inc. v. Tetra Tech, Inc.
2:21-cv-01289-MCS-MAA, C.D. Cal., Judge Scarsi
Certain Robotic Floor Cleaning Devices and Components Thereof
337-TA-1252, ITC, Judge McNamara
Federal Circuit IP Blog
When “and” and “e.g.” Matter: Federal Circuit Revives VLSI vs. Intel Case When “and” and “e.g.” Matter: Federal Circuit Revives VLSI vs. Intel Case
May 14, 2026
Virtual Seminar
Careers in IP Law: A world of possibilities Careers in IP Law: A world of possibilities
February 16, 2022
Virtual
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in the 2026 Legal 500 U.S. Guide Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in the 2026 Legal 500 U.S. Guide
June 10, 2026
The Legal 500Press Release
Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination
May 11, 2026
Commentary
ITC Bars Import of Innoscience Chips Made Before Redesign ITC Bars Import of Innoscience Chips Made Before Redesign
May 8, 2026
Law360Commentary
CBP Clears Redesigned Innoscience Chips After ITC Case CBP Clears Redesigned Innoscience Chips After ITC Case
March 12, 2026
Law360Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.