直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

UK Patent Document Access Rules Raise Secrecy Concerns

August 12, 2026

Law360

A new pilot program from the High Court will implement changes to transparency rules in patent disputes. This formalized practice aims to make court documents publicly available. While some experts broadly welcome the new rules, some are concerned about the potential for exploitation.

Although most parties are willing to hand over skeleton arguments upon request at the hearing itself, the program will push those that might be reluctant to hand over certain documents to share them.

Finnegan partner Jin Ooi spoke with Law360, stating that "There are certain litigants that will happily hand over the skeleton arguments, but are more cautious for witness statements and expert reports and the like… you have to write to them and justify and push them a little."

Some lawyers hope that the two-day period before skeleton arguments are published, and the 14-day period before other documents are made public, will provide sufficient time to ensure appropriate redactions are made to protect commercially sensitive and confidential information.

 “As an idea at a high level, I think it's laudable and to be encouraged,” said Jin. “If there are any concerns it is how it will be implemented. I think that is what people will be paying attention to."

"There are safeguards within the pilot, but I think the question is how practically those safeguards will work in practice," he added.

Read “UK Patent Document Access Rules Raise Secrecy Concerns”

Related Practices

Prosecution and Portfolio Management

Related Offices

London

Related Professionals

Jin Ooi
Partner
London
+44 20 7864 2821
Email

Related News

Commentary

Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool

September 25, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027

September 24, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Commentary

New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret

September 21, 2026

Commentary

Jellycat’s ‘Dupe’ Dilemma: Can IP Protect a ‘Cute’ Aesthetic?

September 16, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Wins “Hatch-Waxman Litigation Firm of the Year – Branded” and David Weingarten Wins “Patent Strategy Attorney of the Year (South)” at the LMG Life Sciences Americas Awards

September 11, 2026

Commentary

Uncrustables Fame Ruling Sets Up Functionality Fight Over Crimped Edge

September 11, 2026

Commentary

Bloomberg Law Q&A with Finnegan IP Lawyer Christian Hurt

September 11, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP