直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

GenAI Patent Surge Extends Well Beyond Familiar Platform Firms

August 10, 2026

Bloomberg Law

Companies with no known ties to artificial intelligence have recently become prominent owners of generative-AI patents. Over the last two years, more GenAI patents were published than in the last decade according to a recent analysis by the World Intellectual Property Organization and analytics firm EconSight.

Businesses within the energy, infrastructure, manufacturing, and telecommunications industry have logged some of the fastest-growing patent activity instead of developing AI models — a shift that lawyers and economists who study AI and intellectual property say reflects the technology’s deepening reach into the broader economy.

This pattern reveals something counterintuitive about how AI is maturing: The companies leading the technology’s development aren’t necessarily the ones staking out intellectual-property territory — and what that divergence ultimately means remains an open question.

Finnegan partner and co-leader of the firm’s AI practice Karthik Kumar spoke with Bloomberg Law and said, “Sophisticated clients are treating this as a period to build and to position, in anticipation of enforcement activity that most expect to intensify.”

Where companies are choosing to file, Karthik said, strategies are increasingly deliberate: greater use of continuation practice, a strategy for filing successive related applications to keep patent families open as inventions evolve; closer attention to drafting claims resilient to Section 101 patent-eligibility challenges; and landscape analysis ahead of product launches.

He identified four areas most likely to generate future enforcement activity: the technical infrastructure enabling AI systems to run efficiently; applied sectors including financial services and healthcare, where damages theories are easiest to construct; agentic and multimodal systems as they mature; and non-practicing entities.

“An assertion wave is being seeded now but has not yet fully arrived,” Karthik said.

Read “GenAI Patent Surge Extends Well Beyond Familiar Platform Firms”

Tags

AI + Patent

Related Practices

Prosecution and Portfolio Management

Related Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML)

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Karthik Kumar, Ph.D.
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4433
Email

Related News

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Award/Ranking

Fourteen Finnegan Attorneys Named to the 2026 IAM Strategy 300 List

August 13, 2026

Commentary

UK Patent Document Access Rules Raise Secrecy Concerns

August 12, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Climbs Two Spots on The American Lawyer’s 2026: A-List Runners Up

August 12, 2026

Award/Ranking

Partner Jeffrey M. Jacobstein Named Finalist for New England Legal Awards

August 10, 2026

Commentary

Q&A: What the 'GenAI Boom' Means for Patents

August 6, 2026

Commentary

U.S. Trademark Owners Turn to "Schedule A" as Blocking Bills Bypass Counterfeiting

August 5, 2026

Commentary

BMW Counsel: How a Supplier Clause Prevented U.S. Trade Secret Litigation

August 3, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP