Associate
Chen has worked on more than 20 IPRs, district court cases, and ITC investigations. These cases cover a wide spectrum of technologies, including wireless communications, memory controller, LCD or LED display, digital signal processor (DSP), computer power systems, semiconductor devices, robotics, consumer electronics, optical communications, computer networking, computer file storage and management, image or video processing, multimedia distribution and streaming systems, mobile applications, and computer gaming.
Chen also maintains an active patent prosecution and counseling practice. He is experienced in patent application drafting and prosecution, opinion work (invalidity and non-infringement), and patent portfolio development and management. He has represented clients in various technology areas, such as 4G/LTE and 5G/NR telecommunication, video coding standards, electric vehicles, autonomous vehicles, unmanned aerial vehicles, positioning and motion-sensing systems, Internet of Things (IoT), consumer electronics, smartphones and cameras, computer hardware and software, wireless communications, semiconductor metrology and fabrication, machine learning, computer vision, image processing systems, optical communications, optical devices, ophthalmic lenses, business methods, financial technologies, and taxi-hailing platforms.
Prior to joining Finnegan, Chen's legal experience included working on several habeas corpus petitions and wrongful termination cases. He authored various memoranda for a local government, analyzing its defense strategies in civil lawsuits. While obtaining his doctorate in physics, Chen conducted research in the areas of optoelectronic devices, display technologies, laser systems, and semiconductor devices.
Chen is passionate about pro bono work. He devotes time to assisting veterans of military service in matters before the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.
Adjunct professor of patent law, Howard University School of Law.
337-TA-1267, ITC, Judge Bhattacharyya
1:19-cv-12125, D. Mass., Judges Burroughs, Kelley
IPR2020-00733, -00734, -00735, -00863, PTAB, Judges Grossman, McMillin, Melvin, Saindon, Wieker
NetApp, Inc./HPE et al. v. KOM Software Inc.
IPR2019-00591, -00592, -00594, -00598, -00601, -00603, -00604, -00606, -00607, -00608, PTAB, Judges McGraw, Galligan, Dougal, Fishman
20-2345, -2346; 21-1181, -1075 -1005, Fed. Cir., Judges Prost, Chen, Taranto
Articles
Motivating Suppliers to Take a License by Suing Several Customers Was Not Improper and Did Not Justify Awarding Attorney Fees Motivating Suppliers to Take a License by Suing Several Customers Was Not Improper and Did Not Justify Awarding Attorney Fees
March 22, 2016
LES InsightsArticles
No Attorney Fees Awarded Despite Weak and Changing Positions and No Direct Evidence of Infringement No Attorney Fees Awarded Despite Weak and Changing Positions and No Direct Evidence of Infringement
December 8, 2015
LES InsightsArticles
Court Denies Discovery of Evidence Regarding IRS' Views on License Agreements Between a Patent Owner and Its Affiliates Court Denies Discovery of Evidence Regarding IRS' Views on License Agreements Between a Patent Owner and Its Affiliates
August 18, 2015
LES InsightsArticles
Court Excludes Testimony that Bases Reasonable-Royalty Damages on Unreliable Data and Includes Unpatented Product Features in the Royalty Base Court Excludes Testimony that Bases Reasonable-Royalty Damages on Unreliable Data and Includes Unpatented Product Features in the Royalty Base
June 15, 2015
LES InsightsPress Release
Finnegan Secures ITC Win on Behalf of BMW Finnegan Secures ITC Win on Behalf of BMW
December 9, 2022
Media Mention
ITC Won't Upend Ruling Clearing BMW, GM in Patent Case ITC Won't Upend Ruling Clearing BMW, GM in Patent Case
December 9, 2022
Law360Media Mention
Fed. Circ. Upholds Partial Ax of 7 Data Storage Patents Fed. Circ. Upholds Partial Ax of 7 Data Storage Patents
December 17, 2021
Law360Due to international data regulations, we’ve recently updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
The Finnegan UPC Hub is a one-stop shop for our insights related to the Unified Patent Court (UPC).