食品・飲料 is part of our work in ホスピタリティ、ゲーム、レジャー, 化学・工業・材料, and 消費財・サービス.
イノベーションで世界に栄養を
食品・飲料は日常生活の中で重要な役割を果たしており、生存のために必要なものであると同時に、文化的意味合いを伝える役目も果たしています。食品・飲料会社が新製品及びパッケージの開発や販売方法に多額の資金を投じるのは当然のことです。企業は、これらの投資を保護するために、イノベーションの結果として生じる知的財産権を取得し、保護する必要があります。弊所は、革新的企業と協働し、製造、製剤開発、加工、包装で生ずる課題に全力で対応いたします。
法律・科学・技術を理解する
弊所は長年にわたり、実用新案及び意匠特許、商標、企業秘密、トレードドレス、著作権、等多岐にわたる知的財産権業務で、食品・飲料企業の製品・ブランド保護を支援してきました。弊所は、これまで培った法的・技術的専門知識、クライアントのビジネスに対する深い理解、そして市場でのクライアントのポジションを正確に把握することによって、ビジネスチャンスを掴み、問題をいち早く予測し、実践的な解決策を投じる、といった支援を提供することができます。
業務内容
Represented Corbion N.V. in litigations against WTI, Inc. involving dry vinegar products.
1:23-cv-00144, S.D. Ga., Judge Epps
1:23-cv-08624, S.D. Ga., Judge Broderick
Finnegan represented Emergy, Inc., d/b/a Meati Foods in a trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, and correction of inventorship case against The Better Meat Company (BMC) and Augustus Pattillo involving alternative meat made from mycelium.
Emergy alleged that Augustus Pattillo stole its trade secrets on the cultivation and production of mycelium that he learned while working as a lab technician for Emergy’s founders, misused them in his work with BMC, breached his nondisclosure agreement with Emergy, and improperly filed patent applications on Emergy’s technology and assigned them to BMC.
BMC filed claims of tortious interference and unfair competition against Emergy, which Emergy succeeded in striking under California’s anti-Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP) statute. After prevailing under the anti-SLAPP statute, Emergy was statutorily entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs for defending against BMC’s stricken claims of tortious interference and unfair competition
Early in the litigation, Emergy defeated BMC’s motion to dismiss Emergy’s trade secret misappropriation and breach of implied contract claims. Emergy later defeated BMC’s motion for summary judgment on Emergy’s trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, and breach of implied contract claims. The case settled soon after the Court issued its summary judgment ruling.
2-21-cv-02338, E.D. Cal., Judge Mueller
2-21-cv-02417, E.D. Cal., Judge Mueller
19-1132, Fed. Cir., Judges Prost, Moore, Wallach
Opposition No. 92059437, TTAB, Judge McCormack
1:19-cv-03944, S.D. Ind., Judge Dinsmore
1:16-cv-00662, D. Del., Judges Fallon, Robinson, Bataillon, Noreika
Represented Nestlé USA in three appeals from inter partes review (IPR) decisions by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). In two cases, the Federal Circuit vacated the PTAB decisions upholding the patentability of the challenged claims and remanded the cases. In the third case, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s finding that the challenged claims were unpatentable.
16-1750, Fed. Cir., Judges Hughes, Mayer, Reyna
17-1193, Fed. Cir., Judges Dyk, Hughes, Reyna
17-1290, Fed. Cir., Judges Dyk, Hughes, Reyna
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Federal Circuit Reverses TTAB: Strength of Mark Depends on Commercial Association
January 13, 2026
European IP Blog
Precision Breeding in England: Navigating the New Regulatory Framework
9 December 2025
INCONTESTABLE® Blog
Federal Circuit Reverses TTAB’s Determination that Trademarks Are Dissimilar Due to Lack of Evidence
September 10, 2025
Press Release
Finnegan Prevails in Trademark Opposition on Behalf of Firm Client Jack’s Family Restaurants
March 27, 2025
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Precedential Trademark Victory for Plumrose Holding Ltd.
February 3, 2025
Media Mention
Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout Outs: Plumrose Holding Ltd.
January 24, 2025
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.