直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 弁護士等
  • 業務内容
  • 論文等
  • オフィス
  • 事務所概要
  • 採用情報
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • 実績

食品・飲料

About

食品・飲料 is part of our work in ホスピタリティ、ゲーム、レジャー, 化学・工業・材料, and 消費財・サービス.

イノベーションで世界に栄養を

食品・飲料は日常生活の中で重要な役割を果たしており、生存のために必要なものであると同時に、文化的意味合いを伝える役目も果たしています。食品・飲料会社が新製品及びパッケージの開発や販売方法に多額の資金を投じるのは当然のことです。企業は、これらの投資を保護するために、イノベーションの結果として生じる知的財産権を取得し、保護する必要があります。弊所は、革新的企業と協働し、製造、製剤開発、加工、包装で生ずる課題に全力で対応いたします。

法律・科学・技術を理解する

弊所は長年にわたり、実用新案及び意匠特許、商標、企業秘密、トレードドレス、著作権、等多岐にわたる知的財産権業務で、食品・飲料企業の製品・ブランド保護を支援してきました。弊所は、これまで培った法的・技術的専門知識、クライアントのビジネスに対する深い理解、そして市場でのクライアントのポジションを正確に把握することによって、ビジネスチャンスを掴み、問題をいち早く予測し、実践的な解決策を投じる、といった支援を提供することができます。

業務内容

  • 高価値製品に関する地方裁判所、控訴裁判所、政府機関における訴訟
  • 訴訟及びその他紛争解決手段による侵害への対応
  • 特許出願戦略の策定及び実施
  • 新製品に関する鑑定書作成及び継続的なカウンセリングの提供
  • フランチャイズを含むライセンシング・プログラムの構築
  • デューディリジェンス調査の実施
  • ポートフォリオ・マネジメント戦略の策定
  • 商標保護サービス及びカウンセリングの提供
  • 欧州連合/英国の証明標章又は団体標章の取得
  • PGI(地理的表示保護)及びPDO (原産地呼称保護)の特定
  • 意匠特許登録

この産業分野の弁護士等

実績

Corbion NV v. WTI, Inc.

Represented Corbion N.V. in litigations against WTI, Inc. involving dry vinegar products.

1:23-cv-00144, S.D. Ga., Judge Epps
1:23-cv-08624, S.D. Ga., Judge Broderick

Trade secret and breach of contract dispute resolved with favorable settlement for Finnegan client Meati Foods

Finnegan represented Emergy, Inc., d/b/a Meati Foods in a trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, and correction of inventorship case against The Better Meat Company (BMC) and Augustus Pattillo involving alternative meat made from mycelium.

Emergy alleged that Augustus Pattillo stole its trade secrets on the cultivation and production of mycelium that he learned while working as a lab technician for Emergy’s founders, misused them in his work with BMC, breached his nondisclosure agreement with Emergy, and improperly filed patent applications on Emergy’s technology and assigned them to BMC.

BMC filed claims of tortious interference and unfair competition against Emergy, which Emergy succeeded in striking under California’s anti-Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP) statute. After prevailing under the anti-SLAPP statute, Emergy was statutorily entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs for defending against BMC’s stricken claims of tortious interference and unfair competition

Early in the litigation, Emergy defeated BMC’s motion to dismiss Emergy’s trade secret misappropriation and breach of implied contract claims. Emergy later defeated BMC’s motion for summary judgment on Emergy’s trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, and breach of implied contract claims. The case settled soon after the Court issued its summary judgment ruling.

2-21-cv-02338, E.D. Cal., Judge Mueller
2-21-cv-02417, E.D. Cal., Judge Mueller

Ambev S.A. v. Cervejaria Petropolis SA
Obtained affirmance from the Federal Circuit of a Finnegan trial victory before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) in cancellation proceeding over FUSION mark for energy drinks.

19-1132, Fed. Cir., Judges Prost, Moore, Wallach
Opposition No. 92059437, TTAB, Judge McCormack

Closure Systems International v. Novembal USA, Inc.
Represented Novembal USA, Inc., the declaratory judgment defendant, in this multi-design patent case directed to designs for closures for bottles. This case favorably settled during discovery.

1:19-cv-03944, S.D. Ind., Judge Dinsmore

AgroFresh Inc. v. Decco U.S. Post-Harvest, Inc. et al.
Represented defendants in action involving patent infringement, trade secrets, and tort claims relating to post-harvest ripening control technology used with produce.

1:16-cv-00662, D. Del., Judges Fallon, Robinson, Bataillon, Noreika

Nestle USA, Inc. v. Steuben Foods, Inc.

Represented Nestlé USA in three appeals from inter partes review (IPR) decisions by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). In two cases, the Federal Circuit vacated the PTAB decisions upholding the patentability of the challenged claims and remanded the cases. In the third case, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s finding that the challenged claims were unpatentable.

16-1750, Fed. Cir., Judges Hughes, Mayer, Reyna
17-1193, Fed. Cir., Judges Dyk, Hughes, Reyna
17-1290, Fed. Cir., Judges Dyk, Hughes, Reyna

More

Insights

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Affirms Indefiniteness of the Term “About”

June 10, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Reverses TTAB: Strength of Mark Depends on Commercial Association

January 13, 2026

European IP Blog

Precision Breeding in England: Navigating the New Regulatory Framework

9 December 2025

Articles

Thumbnail-Certification-Mark-Pitfalls-Managing-Problems-of-Genericness-Descriptiveness-and-Consumer-Protection

Certification Mark Pitfalls: Managing Problems of Genericness, Descriptiveness, and Consumer Perception

September/October 2025

INCONTESTABLE® Blog

Federal Circuit Reverses TTAB’s Determination that Trademarks Are Dissimilar Due to Lack of Evidence

September 10, 2025

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – August 2025

August 4, 2025

More

最新情報

Commentary

Will the Chicago Cubs Win Their Game Over 'The Rooftop Phenomenon'?

June 8, 2026

Commentary

Carnegie v. Carnegie: Concert Hall and Diner Face Off in Court

September 22, 2025

Press Release

Finnegan Prevails in Trademark Opposition on Behalf of Firm Client Jack’s Family Restaurants

March 27, 2025

Commentary

TTAB Denies Jack's Grill TM Over Confusion with Chain

March 24, 2025

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Trademark Victory for Plumrose Holding Ltd.

February 3, 2025

Media Mention

Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout Outs: Plumrose Holding Ltd.

January 24, 2025

More

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • プライバシー
  • 免責事項
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP