直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Federal Circuit decisions in IPRs challenging patentability of patents related to aseptic food processing

Nestle USA, Inc.

Steuben Foods, Inc.

The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled favorably for Finnegan client Nestlé USA in three appeals from inter partes review (IPR) decisions by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). In each IPR, Finnegan challenged the patentability of claims from patents asserted against Nestlé USA in a related patent infringement suit. The PTAB upheld the patentability of challenged claims from two of the patents, so Finnegan appealed to the Federal Circuit. In the appeal, the Federal Circuit vacated the decisions and remanded the cases, ruling that the PTAB adopted erroneous claim constructions. In the third IPR, the PTAB found all the challenged claims unpatentable. Finnegan defended that decision on appeal, which the Federal Circuit affirmed.

Nestle USA, Inc. v. Steuben Foods, Inc., 16-1750, Fed. Cir., Judges Hughes, Mayer, Reyna

Nestle USA, Inc. v. Steuben Foods, Inc., 17-1193, Fed. Cir., Judges Dyk, Hughes, Reyna

Steuben Foods, Inc. v. Nestle USA, Inc., 17-1290, Fed. Cir., Judges Dyk, Hughes, Reyna

Related Professionals

Virginia L. Carron
Partner
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6452
Email
Tyler M. Akagi
Of Counsel
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4385
Email
Kevin D. Rodkey
Partner
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6484
Email

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Industries

Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials

Manufacturing

Chemical

Consumer Products

Energy

Food and Beverage

Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure

Related Experiences

Steuben Foods, Inc. v. Nestlé USA, Inc.

Nestlé USA, Inc.

Pozen Inc. v. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Inc.

Horizon Medicines LLC

Hillcrest Laboratories, Inc. v. Movea, Inc.

Hillcrest Laboratories, Inc.

Trading Technologies, Inc. v. CQG, Inc.

Trading Technologies, Inc.

eSpeed, Inc. v. BrokerTec USA, LLC

BrokerTec USA, LLC

Dialware Communications, LLC v. Hasbro, Inc.

Dialware Communications, LLC

Cox Communications v. Sprint Communication Co.

Sprint Communication Co.

5th Market, Inc. v. Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc.

Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc.

Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. CQG, Inc. 

Trading Technologies International, Inc.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP