直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Article

Certification Mark Pitfalls: Managing Problems of Genericness, Descriptiveness, and Consumer Perception

September/October 2025

The Trademark Reporter

By B. Brett Heavner; Caroline G. Segers

Consumers increasingly seek independent verification that products and services meet safety, environmental, or quality standards, driving the importance of certification marks. This article, written by Brett Heavner and Caroline Segers, explores the challenges certifiers face when registering these marks with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), including refusals based on genericness, descriptiveness, and functionality. Drawing on recent cases involving Gruyere cheese and Tequila, the article analyzes how factors such as evidence, consumer perception, and geographic significance influence registrability, and outlines strategies for certifiers. Click here to read more.

Tags

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Trademark Oppositions and Cancellations

Related Industries

Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials

Manufacturing

Consumer Goods and Services

Food and Beverage

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

B. Brett Heavner
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4073
Email
Caroline G. Segers
Associate
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4183
Email

Originally printed in the September/October 2025 edition of the The Trademark Reporter. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.

Related Insights

Conference

IAM Live: Navigating the UPC 2026

November 3, 2026

Paris

Conference

13th Annual Summit for Women Leaders in Life Sciences Law

July 29-30, 2026

Boston

Conference

2026 China Pharmaceutical Innovation Conference

July 22-24, 2026

Shanghai

Webinar

Successful Strategies to Win Alice Motions and Fee Awards in Patent Cases Against Non-Practicing Entities

July 22, 2026

Webinar

Webinar

Early Motions in Trade Secret Litigation – Offensive and Defensive Insights

July 15, 2026

Webinar

Webinar

Inventive Step in Europe and the US: Comparing the UPC, EPO and National Approaches

July 8, 2026

Webinar

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Vacates and Remands Infringement and Damages Judgment After Erroneous Verdict Form and Eligibility Analysis

July 8, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

“2” Does Not Provide Written Description Support for “1”: Federal Circuit Affirms District Court’s Invalidation of Patent

July 8, 2026

Articles

EPR Academy, Part 4 of 6: Choosing Between EPR, IPR, PGR, and Reissue

July 1, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP