January 13, 2026
Authored and Edited by David L. Nielsen; Wyatt L. Bazrod; Erik R. Puknys
In In re: Bayou Grande Coffee Roasting Co., No. 24-1118 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 9, 2025), the Federal Circuit reversed the TTAB’s determination that use of the mark “KAHWA” for identifying cafés and coffee shops was not registrable, holding there was no evidence of record to establish the term was either generic or merely descriptive.
Generic terms cannot be registered because the terms are incapable of indicating the source of goods or services. The TTAB affirmed the examiner’s refusal to register “KAHWA” since the term refers to a specific type of Kashmiri green tea and cafés and coffee shops serve a variety of tea beverages. The Federal Circuit disagreed, instead finding there was no evidence of record showing any cafés or coffee shops in the United States that served kahwa, and therefore, any customer association of khawa as a specific type of green tea is insufficient to establish genericness for cafés and coffee shops that sell coffee and other types of tea.
Similarly, descriptive marks monopolize common language used to describe key aspects of goods and services and generally cannot be registered. The Federal Circuit rejected the TTAB’s determination that kawha was merely descriptive for cafes and coffee shops, holding that the absence of evidence regarding sales of kahwa necessarily means that selling kahwa, alone, is not characteristic of café and coffee shop services.
Copyright © 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.
Articles
California Reaches Record $12.75 Million CCPA Settlement with General Motors Over Driver Data
June 4, 2026
At the PTAB Blog
Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a
§ 325(d) EPR Denial
May 28, 2026
At the PTAB Blog
IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in March and April 2026
May 26, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.