直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 弁護士等
  • 業務内容
  • 論文等
  • オフィス
  • 事務所概要
  • 採用情報
Finnegan
  • 最新情報
  • Finneganについて
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • プロボノ活動
  • 事務所運営管理
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

Supreme Court Won't Hear Appeal of $46M Limelight Verdict

April 18, 2016

Law360

On April 18, 2016, the Supreme Court ruled that it will not review the Federal Circuit's decision to reinstate a $45M jury verdict in favor of Finnegan client Akamai.

On November 16, 2015, the Federal Circuit ordered a district court judge to reinstate a $45M jury verdict that Limelight Networks infringed Akamai Technologies Inc.’s web content delivery patent. After the August en banc ruling that determined Limelight was liable for infringing, the en banc court sent the case back to the panel to consider Limelight’s alternative arguments for overturning the jury verdict; the panel rejected all of Limelight’s alternative arguments. Limelight later filed a petition for review before the U.S. Supreme Court, which was denied.

Tags

Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)

Related Practices

グローバルな知的財産権利の執行、訴訟、および裁判

Related Industries

Electrical and Computer Technology

IoT

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Summary Determination of No Violation in ITC Vehicle Space Guards Investigation for Drop Stop

October 6, 2026

Commentary

Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool

September 25, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027

September 24, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Commentary

New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret

September 21, 2026

Commentary

Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say

September 17, 2026

Commentary

Jellycat’s ‘Dupe’ Dilemma: Can IP Protect a ‘Cute’ Aesthetic?

September 16, 2026

Commentary

Bloomberg Law Q&A with Finnegan IP Lawyer Christian Hurt

September 11, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • プライバシー
  • 免責事項
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP