Experience
Bell Northern Research, LLC
MediaTek Inc. et al.
Obtained favorable settlement prior to trial at the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) after obtaining a finding of indefiniteness of one of three asserted patents, institution of inter partes review (IPR) of another patent, and filing an offensive case seeking damages, inter alia, in the form of attorneys’ fees for being forced to defend against Bell Northern’s assertion of patents in violation of FRAND licensing obligations.
Electronic Devices and Semiconductor Devices Having Wireless Communication Capabilities and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1367, ITC, Judge Moore
MediaTek Inc. v. Bell Northern Research, LLC, 2:23-cv-10783, C.D. Cal., Judges Anelle-Rocha, Eick
MediaTek Inc. v. Bell Northern Research, LLC et al., IPR2023-01414, PTAB, Judges Abraham, Cass, Hamann
Bell Northern Research, LLC v. HMD America, Inc. et al.
HMD America, Inc. et al.
Noatak Security, LLC v. Accsense, Inc.
Aeroscout, Inc.
Hanwha Q CELLS USA Inc. et al. v. REC Solar Holdings AS et al.
REC Solar Holdings AS et al.
Koninklijke Philips NV et al. v. Tongfang Global Inc. et al.
Koninklijke Philips NV et al.
Pinkerton Tobacco Co., LP et al. v. Kretek International, Inc., et al.
Swedish Match North America LLC et al.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company et al.
Ajinomoto Co., Inc. et al. v. CJ Cheiljedang Corp. et al.
Ajinomoto Company, Inc. et al.
NXP USA Inc. v. MediaTek, Inc. et al.
MediaTek, Inc. et al.
Linak A/S et al. v. Changzou Kaidi Electrical Co., Ltd. et al.
Changzou Kaidi Electrical Co., Ltd. et al.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.