Experience
Ajinomoto Company, Inc. et al.
CJ Cheiljedang Corp. et al.
Represented Ajinomoto in the Southern District of New York in litigation involving patents related to genetically modified organisms and the use thereof to make commercial quantities of tryptophan. The case settled following successful representation of Ajinomoto in related inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, an ITC investigation, and a subsequent Federal Circuit appeal.
Ajinomoto Company, Inc. et al. v. CJ Cheiljedang Corp. et al., 1:16-cv-03498, S.D.N.Y., Judges Gorenstein, Vyskocil
Ajinomoto Company, Inc. et al. v. CJ Cheiljedang Corp. et al., 337-TA-1005, ITC, Judges Bullock, Essex
Ajinomoto Company, Inc. et al. v. CJ Cheiljedang Corp. et al., 18-1590, -1629, Fed. Cir., Judges Dyk, Moore, Taranto
Ajinomoto Company, Inc. et al. v. CJ Cheiljedang Corp. et al., IPR2017-01551, -01698, PTAB, Judges Franklin, Mitchell, Moore, Sawert, Yang
Hanwha Q CELLS USA Inc. et al. v. REC Solar Holdings AS et al.
REC Solar Holdings AS et al.
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. Apotex Corp.
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Tianhai Lace Co. Ltd. et al. v. ASOS PLC. et al.
Tianhai Lace Co. Ltd. et al.
Boston Scientific Corp. et al. v. Cook, Inc. et al.
Boston Scientific Corp. et al.
AbbVie Inc.
REC Solar PTE. Ltd., v. Hanwha Solutions Corp. et al.
REC Solar PTE. Ltd.
Bell Northern Research, LLC v. MediaTek Inc. et al.
MediaTek Inc. et al.
Zimmer Surgical, Inc. et al. v. Stryker Corporation et al.
Zimmer Surgical, Inc.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.