直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Media Mention

PTAB Invalidates Vibrating Orthodontic Device Patent

June 11, 2019

Law360

After a challenge brought by Finnegan on behalf of Propel Orthodontics LLC, the PTAB (Patent Trial and Appeal Board) invalidated OrthoAccel Technologies Inc.’s orthodontic device patent covering a vibrating bite plate and a method of moving teeth by applying vibrations to certain areas of that bite plate. According to the PTAB, the majority of the patent's 27 claims are anticipated based on a 2008 patent application called Lowe. Additionally, the PTAB said that based on a combination of Lowe and an international patent application called Ting, any remaining claims are obvious. OrthoAccel claimed that Lowe could not be used as prior art because the priority date of two applications predated Lowe, however, the PTAB did not agree and said the claims in the instant patent were disclosed after Lowe, in 2009. The PTAB wrote, “We find that petitioner has demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that each of challenged claims ... is unpatentable."

Tags

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)

Related Offices

Boston, MA

Related Professionals

Cory C. Bell
Partner
Boston, MA
+1 617 646 1641
Email
Eric P. Raciti
Partner
Boston, MA
+1 617 646 1675
Email

Related News

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP