直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Personal-Care Company Combe Victorious in Trademark Appeal

April 14, 2021

Intellectual Property Magazine

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled in favor of Finnegan client Combe in another trademark dispute over the VAGISIL trademark. The court ruled that Dr. August Wolff’s VAGISAN mark for feminine healthcare products would cause consumer confusion with Combe’s VAGISIL mark, which has proven its strength as a leader in the feminine-care product space for several decades. Wolff argued that the district court erred in finding that ‘Vagisil’ and ‘Vagisan’ are “sufficiently similar,” but the appeals court disagreed.

Doug Rettew, Anna Naydonov, and Sydney English represented Combe in the district court case and the appeal. They said, “This marks another milestone for the client’s enforcement efforts and comes on the heels of a separate recent trial victory before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, where VAGISERT was refused as confusingly similar to Combe’s Vagisil and Vagistat marks.”

Read “Personal-Care Company Combe Victorious in Trademark Appeal”

Tags

likelihood of confusion

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Trademark Litigation and Trials

Trademark and Brand Management

Related Industries

Consumer Goods and Services

Consumer Products

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Douglas A. Rettew
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4161
Email

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Expands U.S. Platform with Launch of Dallas Office

September 2, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP