直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

NPE Litigation in the U.S. Bounces Back

September 22, 2021

Intellectual Asset Management (IAM)

Intellectual Asset Management magazine partnered with Unified Patents to analyze patent litigation data between 2018 and 2020, which showed a significant increase in non-practicing entity (NPE) litigation. According to the data, NPE litigation increased by triple digits in the transportation, financial services, and networking industries, and by double digits in other industries such as Internet of Things (IoT), mobile, and open source. IAM interviewed Finnegan partners Linda Thayer and James Barney for their insights into the trend.

Linda believes that the number of IoT cases being litigated is a result of market and legal changes that are pushing up the number of patent cases overall. Factors such as the Western District of Texas being known for moving cases faster than the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and the PTAB’s Apple v. Fintiv decision have caused patentees to become more confident in prevailing in court. Another factor contributing to the growth is increased availability of litigation funding. Linda said, “Interest rates are at all-time lows, and investors are looking at more creative ways to get a return on investment on their cash piles. Big Tech seems to have been one sector that has weathered the pandemic rather successfully, making them ripe targets.”

The report shows that the transport and automotive industries, in particular, have experienced the lowest numbers of NPEs out of all the industries analyzed for the report. James further suggests that the low number of NPEs in the automotive industry could be due to the patents in the industry being vulnerable to patentability challenges under Alice. He continues to explain that "collective defense organizations such as RPX and Unified Patents" play a large role in minimizing "NPE litigation against automotive companies."

Read “NPE Litigation in the U.S. Bounces Back”

Tags

non-practicing entity (NPE)

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Related Industries

Communications

Internet of Things (IoT)

Related Professionals

James R. Barney
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4412
Email

Related News

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Recognized Again Among Germany’s Leading Law Firms

October 9, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Summary Determination of No Violation in ITC Vehicle Space Guards Investigation for Drop Stop

October 6, 2026

Commentary

Catching Up with Hope Shimabuku

September 29, 2026

Commentary

Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool

September 25, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027

September 24, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Commentary

New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret

September 21, 2026

Commentary

FORUM IP Talks: Dr. Jochen Herr on UPC, FRAND, and Cross-Border Enforcement Topics

September 20, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP