直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Navy Vet Argues a Navy Vet's Case

August 31, 2022

Law.com's Supreme Court Brief

On October 3, 2022, Finnegan partner James Barney will argue before the Supreme Court of the United States on behalf of a Navy veteran seeking to recover retroactive disability benefits dating back to his date of discharge. One of the few veterans pro bono cases to reach the Supreme Court, the case involves the key issue of equitable tolling, which states that “a statute of limitations will not bar a claim if despite use of due diligence the plaintiff did not or could not discover the injury until after the expiration of the limitations period.” The decision has the potential to impact thousands of veterans in long and hard-fought cases over disability benefits. Law.com’s Supreme Court Brief interviewed James as he prepared for arguments.

James said it all comes down to the Irwin v. Dept. of Veterans Affairs case, a decision that was handed down over 30 years ago. The decision stated that if equitable tolling is available to certain types of time limits in cases against private parties, then it should be available in cases against the government unless the government can prove otherwise. James said, “When you look at the timing provision in this statute, it seems to fall into that bucket [for private parties]. For some reason it’s been deemed unavailable to veterans, which is unfair. If anything, the doctrine should be even more available to veterans than less.”

Read “Navy Vet Argues a Navy Vet's Case”

Tags

pro bono, Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), equitable tolling

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

James R. Barney
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4412
Email

Related News

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP