直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Press Release

Federal Circuit Affirms Victory for Finnegan Client Castle Retail Against Hawk Technology Systems

November 17, 2025

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
November 17, 2025

WASHINGTON, DC— On November 14, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a legal victory on behalf of Finnegan client Castle Retail, a family-owned chain of neighborhood grocery stores in Memphis, Tennessee. The Court upheld the decision of District Judge Jon P. McCalla, who previously ruled in favor of Castle Retail and awarded attorney fees against Hawk Technology Systems under 35 U.S.C § 285, based on the finding that the case was exceptional.

Hawk sued Castle Retail in 2020, alleging infringement of Hawk’s patent directed to a method of viewing multiple videos simultaneously on a video surveillance system. Castle Retail successfully argued before Judge McCalla in 2021 that the patent is directed to ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C § 101, and the Federal Circuit affirmed Judge McCalla’s decision in 2023. Judge McCalla then awarded Castle Retail its attorney fees, which the Federal Circuit affirmed on Hawk’s appeal.

The Federal Circuit’s decision is especially important because the Court rejected every argument made by Hawk and confirmed that Castle Retail was entitled to recover its legal fees based on the totality of the circumstances, and that Judge McCalla did not abuse his discretion in awarding Castle Retail its attorney fees. In particular, the Federal Ciruit agreed that Hawk’s lawsuit, which was one among many in a pattern of frivolous lawsuits brought by Hawk, was exceptionally weak and that Hawk’s conduct during the case, including its misconduct during settlement negotiations, was unreasonable. As a result, Hawk Technology Systems must pay Castle Retail’s attorney fees and additional appellate costs.

“We are very pleased with the Federal Circuit’s well-reasoned decision affirming Judge McCalla’s award of attorney fees in Castle Retail’s favor,” said Finnegan partner Justin Hasford, lead counsel for Castle Retail in this litigation.

Contacts

Terra Liddell, Chief Marketing Officer
terra.liddell@finnegan.com

Angela Robinson, Director of Branding and Communications
angela.robinson@finnegan.com


About Finnegan
When your most valuable assets are ideas, innovation, and brand—you need the best to protect them. Finnegan, a premier intellectual property law firm, is trusted by global leaders to protect and advance what sets them apart. With 11 offices across the globe, we bring local insight and global reach to every IP challenge. We are located in Atlanta, Boston, London, Munich, Palo Alto, Reston, Seoul, Shanghai, Taipei, Tokyo and Washington, DC. From high-stakes litigation to cutting-edge patent strategy and innovative brand management, we deliver unmatched depth, agility, and results. If it is IP, it is Finnegan. Please visit us at www.finnegan.com or follow us on LinkedIn to see how we’re shaping the future of IP, one breakthrough at a time.

Tags

attorney fees

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

Consumer Goods and Services

Consumer Products

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Justin J. Hasford
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4175
Email
Jason L. Romrell
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4349
Email

Related News

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP