直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

Federal Circuit's Cuozzo Opinion Highlights Unresolved IPR Issues

February 9, 2015

Managing Intellectual Property

On February 4, 2015, the Federal Circuit released its first opinion on a Patent Trial and Appeal Board appeal, In Re Cuozzo Speed Technologies. Managing Intellectual Property contacted Finnegan attorney Timothy McAnulty to discuss the importance of this opinion on an inter partes review appeal that “affirmed the Board’s final determination, and found no error in the Board’s claim construction under the broadest reasonable interpretation standard, the Board’s obviousness determination, and the Board’s denial of Cuozzo’s motion to amend.” McAnulty, citing Judge Pauline Newman's decent, stated, "The opinion addresses several of the leading issues, but the split panel still highlights the different views on IPRs and the AIA." He goes on to state "Perhaps more notably, the majority held the Federal Circuit lacks jurisdiction to review the Office’s institution decision even after a final written decision."

Tags

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), America Invents Act (AIA), Cuozzo Speed Technologies LLC v. Lee

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

專利局受理之無效程序

專利審理暨訴願委員會受理之無效程序: 多方複審及核准後複審

Related Professionals

Timothy P. McAnulty
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4348
Email

Related News

Award/Ranking

Forbes Names Finnegan Partner Erika Harmon Arner on its Inaugural 2026 America’s Top Women Lawyers List

June 5, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in 2026 IAM Patent 1000 Guide; Nearly 60 Attorneys Ranked

May 28, 2026

Commentary

Quince Aims to Have ‘Dupe’ Evidence Shape Ugg Shoe Patent Trial

May 26, 2026

Commentary

New Appellate Opinion in Amazon Biometric Data Case May Signal ‘Narrowing’ Scope of BIPA Litigation, Experts Say

May 20, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Partner Antje Brambrink Shortlisted for Women in Business Law EMEA Award

May 13, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination

May 11, 2026

Commentary

ITC Bars Import of Innoscience Chips Made Before Redesign

May 8, 2026

Award/Ranking

Associates Rank Finnegan “Best of the Best” in BTI Associate Satisfaction Survey

May 7, 2026

Commentary

How Litigation Funding Disclosure Could Affect ITC Cases

May 7 , 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP