直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

Fed. Circ. Says PTAB Wrongly Axed PPC Patents in AIA Review

February 22, 2016

Law360

On February 22, 2016 the Federal Circuit ruled that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) erroneously invalidated claims of three of Finnegan client PPC Broadband's coaxial cable technology patents. Corning Optical Communications challenged the claims at the PTAB in 2014 and in an inter partes review proceeding, the Board found that all 78 of PPC Broadband’s patents were obvious. However, the Federal Circuit vacated the PTAB's findings on 49 of the challenged claims, finding that either the board's claim construction was wrong or the prior art did not support its finding.

Finnegan attorney J. Michael Jakes represented PPC Broadband and said that he was "pleased that the Federal Circuit recognized the errors in the PTAB's rulings." He added, "This case is a significant victory for PPC—and for patent owners—because it makes clear that infringers like Corning can no longer assume that the broadest reasonable interpretation standard will excuse their misconduct after-the-fact. Moreover, this case re-emphasizes how the different claim construction standards between the patent office and district courts can cause disparate results. The Supreme Court will be addressing this issue in Cuozzo."

Tags

claim construction, broadest reasonable interpretation (BRI), PPC Broadband Inc., United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Related Industries

Electrical and Computer Technology

Related Professionals

J. Michael Jakes
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4045
Email

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Summary Determination of No Violation in ITC Vehicle Space Guards Investigation for Drop Stop

October 6, 2026

Commentary

Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool

September 25, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027

September 24, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Commentary

Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say

September 17, 2026

Commentary

Jellycat’s ‘Dupe’ Dilemma: Can IP Protect a ‘Cute’ Aesthetic?

September 16, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Wins “Hatch-Waxman Litigation Firm of the Year – Branded” and David Weingarten Wins “Patent Strategy Attorney of the Year (South)” at the LMG Life Sciences Americas Awards

September 11, 2026

Commentary

Uncrustables Fame Ruling Sets Up Functionality Fight Over Crimped Edge

September 11, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP