In Suprema Inc. et al. v. International Trade Commission, a split Federal Circuit ruled that the ITC has the authority to police induced infringement claims. This closes loopholes and prevents importers from bringing infringing products into the United States. The decision reversed a 2013 precedential ruling, which found that Section 337 of the Tariff Act only covers products that directly infringe U.S. patents at the time of importation. Finnegan attorney Eric J. Fues filed the amicus brief on behalf of the International Trade Commission Trial Lawyers Association. He said that the Federal Circuit's decision settles the question of whether a solution for the indirect infringement of method claims can be pursued at the ITC. He believes that the Federal Circuit's split decision may lead to an appeal at the Supreme Court.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), International Trade Commission (ITC)
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in 2026 IAM Patent 1000 Guide; Nearly 60 Attorneys Ranked
May 28, 2026
Commentary
May 20, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Partner Antje Brambrink Shortlisted for Women in Business Law EMEA Award
May 13, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination
May 11, 2026
Award/Ranking
Associates Rank Finnegan “Best of the Best” in BTI Associate Satisfaction Survey
May 7, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.