直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 我们的专业人员
  • 服务
  • 我们的见解
  • 办公室
  • 事务所
  • 人才招聘
Finnegan
  • 新闻
  • 飞翰事实
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • 慈善性法律援助
  • 管理层
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

Patent Claims Ruling for Wyeth Sticks in Effexor® Suit

July 16, 2010

Law360

A federal judge has denied a bid by Sandoz Inc. for an interlocutory appeal of a claims construction ruling that resulted in partial summary judgment for Wyeth in its patent infringement suit over a proposed generic version of depression and anxiety drug Effexor®. Judge James C. Denver III of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina ruled Wednesday that Sandoz failed to meet the standard necessary for an interlocutory appeal. In March, Sandoz asked Judge Denver to immediately certify his order granting summary judgment to Wyeth for an interlocutory appeal, saying that seven different courts have examined Wyeth's patent claims and come to different conclusions on how they should be constructed. In denying the motion for appeal, Judge Denver found that many more courts had adopted the broader construction of the term ‘extended release formulation’, so “no substantial ground for difference of opinion exists as to whether 'extended release formulation' is limited to specific ingredients,” such that an interlocutory appeal was warranted. The judge also ruled that because the issues raised by Sandoz were not controlling questions of law, an interlocutory appeal would not materially advance the litigation. Wyeth is represented by Finnegan.

Related News

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • 隐私
  • 免责申明
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP