直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Successful outcomes at the USPTO and district court in multi-patent lawsuit

Finnegan successfully represented the patentee in a patent infringement lawsuit involving multiple patents in federal district court, obtaining a jury verdict that each of the patents was infringed and that none of them was invalid. After the jury trial, the defendant filed a series of reexamination requests for each of the patents, resulting in multiple reexamination proceedings (both ex parte and inter partes). In connection with these reexamination proceedings, Finnegan worked with prosecution counsel to devise a reexamination strategy, to draft responses to office actions and supporting expert declarations, and to prepare prosecution counsel for PTO interviews (including preparation of experts for the interviews). As a result of Finnegan’s efforts, the PTO has agreed to issue reexamination certificates, with minor amendments, for several of the patents, and we expect the same result for the remaining patents. In the interim, Finnegan’s client settled the infringement lawsuit, receiving substantial compensation based on our victory in federal court.

Related Practices

Ex Parte Reexamination (EPR)

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

Related Experiences

Finnegan provides appellate relief for manufacturer of oil & gas equipment manufacturer hit with $70 million district court judgment

Foster Wheeler Energy Corp.

District court ruling maintains patent protection of Forest’s Savella®

Forest Laboratories Inc.

Experience_District_court_ruling_maintains_patent_protection_for_Allergan’s_Saphris

District court ruling maintains patent protection for Allergan’s Saphris®

Allergan/Forest Laboratories

Patent pooling in the telecommunications industry

Using reexamination as a patent litigation strategy

District court finds patent covering Cephalon’s wakefulness improving drug Nuvigil®, valid in ANDA litigation

Cephalon Inc.

District court ruling maintains patent and regulatory protection of Otsuka’s Abilify®

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Finnegan secures dismissal for Verizon in multi-district litigation filed by Bear Creek Technologies, Inc.

Verizon

Experience_District_court_finds_patent_covering_AstraZeneca’s_type_II_diabetes_drugs_Onglyza_and_Kombiglyze_valid_in_ANDA_litigation

District court finds patent covering AstraZeneca’s type II diabetes drugs Onglyza® and Kombiglyze® valid in ANDA litigation

AstraZeneca AB

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP