直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

District court finds patent covering Cephalon’s wakefulness improving drug Nuvigil®, valid in ANDA litigation

Cephalon Inc.

Apotex Corp.

The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware ruled in favor of Finnegan clients Cephalon Inc., Cephalon France, and Teva Santé SAS, finding valid the listed patent for the active ingredient in Cephalon’s wakefulness improving drug, Nuvigil®. Having already conceded infringement prior to trial, four generic pharmaceutical companies alleged that the listed patent, claiming a particular polymorphic form of armodafinil, was anticipated and obvious. Finding that the generic defendants failed to demonstrate inherent anticipation, Chief Judge Sleet held that the generic defendants’ experts did not show clearly and convincingly that the claimed form of armodafinil was the “necessary and inevitable result” of practicing the prior art patent. The court further held that the polymorphic form of armodafinil claimed in the patent would not have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art. Chief Judge Sleet enjoined the generic defendants from manufacturing, using, offering for sale, or selling their proposed armodafinil ANDA products, and further enjoined the FDA from approving the defendants’ ANDAs, before the expiration of Cephalon’s patent covering Nuvigil®.

Cephalon Inc. v. Apotex Corp., 1:10-md-02200, D. Del., Judge Sleet

Related Professionals

Mark J. Feldstein, Ph.D.
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4092
Email
Danielle A. Duszczyszyn, Ph.D.
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4142
Email

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

Branded Hatch-Waxman (ANDA) Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

Life Sciences

Pharmaceutical

Related Experiences

Jacob Devine v. Bethesda Softworks LLC, et al.

Bethesda Softworks LLC, et al.

The Hillman Group, Inc. v. KeyMe, LLC

The Hillman Group, Inc.

Finnegan secures strategic damages award for Under Armour in trademark infringement litigation

Under Armour

Finnegan secures dismissal for Verizon in multi-district litigation filed by Bear Creek Technologies, Inc.

Verizon

Finnegan secures $180M for CSRC in complex arbitrations

CSRC et al.

Eastern District of Texas invalidates patent asserted against Finnegan client FedEx Corporation

FedEx Corp.

Defeating a motion for preliminary injunction in the Western District of Texas

Cosentino SA et al

Federal Circuit reverses district court ruling of invalidity and upholds rulings on other grounds in favor of Finnegan client Eli Lilly and Co.

Eli Lilly and Company

Mayo v. Prometheus (amicus)

SAP AG

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP