直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

District court ruling maintains patent protection of Forest’s Savella®

Forest Laboratories Inc.

Apotex Corp.

The District of Delaware ruled in favor of Finnegan client Forest Laboratories in a Hatch-Waxman litigation against generic pharmaceutical defendant Mylan, Inc. The suit involved Savella®, a medicine containing the active ingredient milnacipran, which is used for the treatment of fibromyalgia. The court held the asserted claims of all three patents litigated at trial valid and infringed, denying defendants claims that the patents were obvious and anticipated by prior art. In the words of the court, "[a]t best, the teaching of the art was and is multidirectional, with no clear motivation to pursue milnacipran as an effective treatment for fibromyalgia. Notably, there were no FDA-approved treatments for fibromyalgia at the time of the patents-in-suit. Consequently, the inventors' development of treating fibromyalgia with milnacipran was the antithesis of anticipation and obviousness as discussed in more detail below." The court entered final judgment and ordered the FDA not to approve Mylan’s Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) for generic milnacipran until after the expiration of the last Forest patent litigated at trial.

Forest Laboratories Inc. v. Apotex Corp., 1:13-cv-01602, D. Del., Judge Robinson

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

Branded Hatch-Waxman (ANDA) Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

Life Sciences

Pharmaceutical

Related Experiences

The Hillman Group, Inc. v. KeyMe, LLC

The Hillman Group, Inc.

District court rules in favor of Finnegan client AbbVie

AbbVie Inc.

Defeating a motion for preliminary injunction in the Western District of Texas

Cosentino SA et al

Litigation for the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA)

Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA)

Glenmark Generics Ltd. v. GlaxoSmithKline, PLC

GlaxoSmithKline, PLC

e.Digital Corp. v. ZTE

ZTE

MyMail, Ltd. v. Conduit Ltd.

Conduit Ltd.

Sun Nuclear v. IBA 

IBA

Nikon Corp. v. Sakar Int'l Inc.

Nikon Corp.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP