Experience
Handled an appeal for an oil-refining equipment manufacturer accused by a rival of misappropriating trade secrets. The district court had found that the manufacturer had hired away the rival’s employees and encouraged them to use their former employer’s trade secrets to design refinery equipment. The district court awarded nearly $70,000,000 in damages. After a one-sided oral argument in which all three judges on the panel repeatedly criticized the district court’s reasoning, the case settled for a tiny fraction of the original award.
American Petroleum Institute (API)
United Catalysts turns to Finnegan to reverse an unfavorable judgment and $80 million in damages
United Catalysts
Caterpillar, Inc.
District court enters judgment of noninfringement for Finnegan client Philips
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Toyota Motor Corp.
Vacating a $110 million judgment against Finnegan client TCL Communication
TCL Communication Technology
$45 million judgment overturned for Ericsson
Ericsson Inc.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.