直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

District court finds patent covering AstraZeneca’s type II diabetes drugs Onglyza® and Kombiglyze® valid in ANDA litigation

AstraZeneca AB

Aurobindo Pharma, Ltd.

The U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware ruled in favor of Finnegan client AstraZeneca AB, finding that the listed patent for the active ingredient, saxagliptin, in AstraZeneca’s type II diabetes drugs Onglyza® and Kombiglyze® was valid and infringed. Having conceded infringement prior to trial, 11 generic pharmaceutical companies alleged that claims directed to the compound saxagliptin were invalid as obvious. Finding that the generic defendants failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that the asserted claims would have been obvious at the time the patent application was filed, the presiding judge held that defendants’ alleged motivations were “at odds with the teachings of the prior art” and appeared to be “the product of a classic hindsight analysis.” The generic defendants are enjoined from making, using, offering for sale, selling, or importing into the United States their proposed generic saxagliptin products before the expiration of AstraZeneca’s patent. The patent at issue was also sustained in a parallel IPR proceeding.

AstraZeneca AB v. Aurobindo Pharma, Ltd., 1:14-cv-00664, D. Del., Judge Sleet

Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Wockhardt Bio AG; Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.; Aurobindo Pharma U.S.A. Inc.; Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.; Sun Pharma Global FZE; Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. AstraZeneca AB, IPR2015-01340, PTAB, Judges Elluru, Paulraj, Tierney

Related Professionals

John D. Livingstone
Partner
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6449
Email
M. David Weingarten, Ph.D.
Partner
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6457
Email
Kassandra M. Officer
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4270
Email
Anthony A. Hartmann
Of Counsel
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4275
Email

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

Branded Hatch-Waxman (ANDA) Litigation and Trials

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Industries

Life Sciences

Pharmaceutical

Related Experiences

Experience_District_court_ruling_maintains_patent_protection_for_Allergan’s_Saphris

District court ruling maintains patent protection for Allergan’s Saphris®

Allergan/Forest Laboratories

District court rules in favor of Finnegan client AbbVie

AbbVie Inc.

AstraZeneca AB v. Lannett Holdings, Inc.

AstraZeneca AB

Spherix Inc. v. Verizon Services Corp.

Verizon

Duchesnay, Inc. v. Actavis Laboratories Inc. and Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Duchesnay

Stryker Corp. v. Zimmer, Inc.

Zimmer, Inc.

The Hillman Group, Inc. v. KeyMe, LLC

The Hillman Group, Inc.

Bausch + Lomb v. Sandoz, Inc.

Bausch + Lomb; Mitsubishi Tanabe; Ube; Senju

Senju Pharmaceutical Co.; Bausch + Lomb v. Lupin Ltd.

Senju Pharmaceutical Co.; Bausch + Lomb

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP