Protecting a blockbuster diabetes treatment for AstraZeneca
AstraZeneca AB
Major victories across IP venues for Volkswagen, Audi, Bentley, and Lamborghini
Audi AG; Audi of America, LLC; Automobili Lamborghini America, LLC; Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A.; Bentley Motors Limited; Bentley Motors, Inc; Volkswagen AG; Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
No confusion in trademark victory on summary judgment for the American Retirement Association
American Retirement Association
Finnegan helps Intellia Therapeutics acquire Rewrite Therapeutics, Inc. for $45 million
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
Finnegan secures favorable ITC ruling related to innovative electric SUVs for BMW
BMW of North America, LLC and Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
Finnegan fights for Sony’s “exceedingly famous” mark
Sony Group Corporation
Experience
Finnegan revives key Jublia® patent at the Federal Circuit Finnegan revives key Jublia® patent at the Federal Circuit
3:18-cv-13635, D.N.J., Judges Martinotti, Goodman
18-2232, Fed. Cir., Judges Newman, O'Malley, Taranto
IPR2017-00190, PTAB, Judges Mitchell, Franklin, Pollock
IPR2017-01429, PTAB, Judges Mitchell, Franklin, Pollock
Experience
Tianma Micro-Electronics Co. v. Japan Display Inc.; Panasonic Liquid Display Co. Tianma Micro-Electronics Co. v. Japan Display Inc.; Panasonic Liquid Display Co.
IPR2016-00990, -00991, PTAB, Judges Obermann, Kokoski, Kalan, Roesel
Experience
Eli Lilly and Company v. Actavis Labs. UT Inc. Eli Lilly and Company v. Actavis Labs. UT Inc.
1:16-cv-01119, E.D. Va., Judges Nachmanoff, Trenga
Experience
District court finds patent covering AstraZeneca’s type II diabetes drugs Onglyza® and Kombiglyze® valid in ANDA litigation District court finds patent covering AstraZeneca’s type II diabetes drugs Onglyza® and Kombiglyze® valid in ANDA litigation
1:14-cv-00664, D. Del., Judge Sleet
IPR2015-01340, PTAB, Judges Elluru, Paulraj, Tierney
Experience
SK Innovation Co., Ltd. v. Celgard, LLC SK Innovation Co., Ltd. v. Celgard, LLC
IPR2014-00679, -00680, PTAB, Judges Crumbley, Praiss, Prats
Experience
POSCO v. Nippon Steel POSCO v. Nippon Steel
90/012,482; 95/002,163; 95/002,165; 95/002,166, PTAB, Judges Lopez, Vincent
Experience
ITC issues final determination in favor of Finnegan client SKC ITC issues final determination in favor of Finnegan client SKC
337-TA-772, ITC, Judge Rogers
2:11-cv-03397, N.D. Cal., Judges Bernal, Fitzgerald, Nguyen, Zarefsky
18-1313, Fed. Cir.
Experience
Eastman Chemical Co. v. AlphaPet, Inc.; DAK Americas LLC Eastman Chemical Co. v. AlphaPet, Inc.; DAK Americas LLC
1:09-cv-00971, 1:10-cv-00163, D. Del., Judges Farnan, Stark
Experience
Finnegan client UTC defeats Rolls-Royce's jet engine patent infringement claim Finnegan client UTC defeats Rolls-Royce's jet engine patent infringement claim
1:10-cv-00457, E.D. Va., Judges Anderson, Brinkema
Experience
L'Oreal S.A. v. Clairol Inc. and Estee Lauder, Inc. L'Oreal S.A. v. Clairol Inc. and Estee Lauder, Inc.
2:02-cv-02596; 2:04-cv-01660, D.N.J., Judges Bassler; Ackerman, Brown, Salas
Experience
Gold Peak Battery Company avoids trial and maintains a competitive position Gold Peak Battery Company avoids trial and maintains a competitive position
337-TA-493, ITC, Judge Bullock
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.