Experience
SK Innovation Co., Ltd.
Celgard, LLC
Representing SK Innovation in a pair of inter partes reviews (IPRs) regarding lithium batteries.
SK Innovation Co., Ltd. v. Celgard, LLC, IPR2014-00679, -00680, PTAB, Judges Crumbley, Praiss, Prats
Finnegan secures dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction for client SK Innovation
SK Innovation Co. Ltd.
Freedom Innovations, LLC v. Blatchford Products Ltd.
Freedom Innovations, LLC
Guangdong Xinbao Electrical Appliances Holdings Co. v. Adrian Rivera
Guangdong Xinbao Electronics Appliances Holding Co., Ltd.
Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. Shenzhen AOTO Electronics Co., Ltd.
Shenzhen AOTO Electronics Co., Ltd
SFC Co., Ltd. v. LG Chem, Ltd.
LG Chem, Ltd.
Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.; Toshiba Corporation
Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd. et al.
Toyota Motor Corporation et al.
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.