直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Tianma Micro-Electronics Co. v. Japan Display Inc.; Panasonic Liquid Display Co.

Tianma Micro-Electronics Co.

Japan Display Inc., Panasonic Liquid Display Co.

Represented Tianma in a pair of inter partes review (IPR) proceedings regarding liquid crystal displays (LCD).

Tianma Micro-Electronics Co. v. Japan Display Inc., Panasonic Liquid Display Co., IPR2016-00990, -00991, PTAB, Judges Obermann, Kokoski, Kalan, Roesel

Related Professionals

Anthony A. Hartmann
Of Counsel
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4275
Email

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Industries

Electrical and Computer Technology

Related Experiences

Japan Display Inc. f/k/a Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc. et al v. Tianma Microelectronics Co.

Tianma Microelectronics Co., Ltd.

Innovative Display Techs. LLC v. Hyundai Motor Co.

Toyota Motor Corp.

Certain Probe Card Assemblies and Certain Tested DRAM and NAND Flash Memory Devices

Phicom Corporation

Smith Interface Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

Eidos Display, LLC et al. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al.

HannStar Display Corporation and Hannspree North America, Inc.

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. S3 Graphics Co., Ltd.

S3 Graphics Co., Ltd.

Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

IDQ Operating, Inc. v. Aerospace Communications Holdings Co., Ltd. 

Aerospace Communications Holdings Co., Ltd.

Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. Shenzhen AOTO Electronics Co., Ltd.

Shenzhen AOTO Electronics Co., Ltd

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP