Experience
Tianma Micro-Electronics Co.
Japan Display Inc., Panasonic Liquid Display Co.
Represented Tianma in a pair of inter partes review (IPR) proceedings regarding liquid crystal displays (LCD).
Tianma Micro-Electronics Co. v. Japan Display Inc., Panasonic Liquid Display Co., IPR2016-00990, -00991, PTAB, Judges Obermann, Kokoski, Kalan, Roesel
Japan Display Inc. f/k/a Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc. et al v. Tianma Microelectronics Co.
Tianma Microelectronics Co., Ltd.
Innovative Display Techs. LLC v. Hyundai Motor Co.
Toyota Motor Corp.
Certain Probe Card Assemblies and Certain Tested DRAM and NAND Flash Memory Devices
Phicom Corporation
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. S3 Graphics Co., Ltd.
S3 Graphics Co., Ltd.
Eidos Display, LLC et al. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al.
HannStar Display Corporation and Hannspree North America, Inc.
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. Shenzhen AOTO Electronics Co., Ltd.
Shenzhen AOTO Electronics Co., Ltd
IDQ Operating, Inc. v. Aerospace Communications Holdings Co., Ltd.
Aerospace Communications Holdings Co., Ltd.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.