直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

District court enters judgment of noninfringement for Finnegan client Philips

Luv N’Care, Ltd.

Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.

Following a claim construction ruling in Philips’ favor, plaintiff Luv n’ Care stipulated to a final judgment that Philips did not infringe the five asserted patents related to toddler sippy cups.  Accordingly, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas entered a judgment of noninfringement in favor of Finnegan clients Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., Philips Electronics North America Corporation, and Avent Ltd, which the Federal Circuit affirmed.

Luv N’Care, Ltd. v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., 2:11-cv-00512, E.D. Tex., Judges Gilstrap, Payne

Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. Luv N’Care, Ltd., 14-1007, Fed. Cir., Judges Newman, Prost, Taranto

Related Professionals

Frank A. DeCosta, Ph.D.
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4012
Email
Aaron L. Parker
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4387
Email
Daniel G. Chung
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4355
Email

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Pretrial Strategies

Related Industries

Consumer Goods and Services

Consumer Products

Related Experiences

Federal Circuit affirms claim construction and summary judgment of noninfringement in favor of Finnegan client Pergo

Pergo LLC

District court rules in favor of Finnegan client AbbVie

AbbVie Inc.

District court grants summary judgment in favor of AstraZeneca finding invalid all asserted claims against anti-cholesterol drug Crestor®

AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP

Eastern District of Texas invalidates patent asserted against Finnegan client FedEx Corporation

FedEx Corp.

District court grants summary judgment of noninfringement for Finnegan client Toyota against Solomon Technologies, Inc.

Toyota Motor Corp.

Finnegan client FedEx defeats Ronald Katz’s 11 year licensing litigation

FedEx Corp.

Federal Circuit rules in favor of Finnegan clients Hyundai and Kia in a tire pressure monitoring system patent case

Hyundai Motor Co.; Kia Motors Corp.

Lochner Technologies LLC v. Toshiba America, Inc.

Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.

Rembrandt Patent Innovations, LLC and Rembrandt Secure Computing, LP v. Apple Inc.

Rembrandt Patent Innovations, LLC; Rembrandt Secure Computing

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP