直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Federal Circuit rules in favor of Finnegan clients Hyundai and Kia in a tire pressure monitoring system patent case

MHL TEK, LLC

Hyundai Motor Co.; Kia Motors Corp.

 In a unanimous opinion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that MHL Tek LLC did not own three Tire Pressure Monitoring System patents, resulting in a victory for Finnegan clients Hyundai Motor Company and Kia Motors Company and other automobile maker co-defendants.  Specifically, the Federal Circuit (1) affirmed the Eastern District of Texas court’s holding that MHL Tek lacks standing to assert two of the three patents-in-suit, and (2) reversed the court’s holding that MHL Tek has standing to assert the third patent-in-suit.

MHL TEK, LLC v. Hyundai Motor Co.; Kia Motors Corp., 10-1287, -1317, -1318, Fed. Cir., Judges Newman, Mayer, Bryson

MHL TEK, LLC v. Hyundai Motor Co.; Kia Motors Corp., 2:07-cv-00516; 2:07-cv-00289, E.D. Tex., E.D. Tex., Judges Ward, Folsom, Gilstrap

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Related Industries

Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials

Manufacturing

Electrical and Computer Technology

Transportation and Logistics

Automotive and Smart Mobility Tech

Related Experiences

Federal Circuit rules in favor of Finnegan client in radial arm saw guard patent case

Michael S. Powell

Federal Circuit reverses district court ruling of invalidity and upholds rulings on other grounds in favor of Finnegan client Eli Lilly and Co.

Eli Lilly and Company

Finnegan client FedEx defeats Ronald Katz’s 11 year licensing litigation

FedEx Corp.

Eastern District of Texas invalidates patent asserted against Finnegan client FedEx Corporation

FedEx Corp.

Federal Circuit rules in favor of Finnegan client InterDigital in appeal from ITC case

InterDigital Communications Corp.

District court enters judgment of noninfringement for Finnegan client Philips

Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.

American Vehicular Sciences v. Hyundai and Kia

Hyundai; Kia

Sun Pharmaceutical Inds. v. Eli Lilly and Co. 

Eli Lilly and Company

Federal Circuit reverses ITC finding in favor of Finnegan client John Mezzalingua Associates

John Mezzalingua Associates, Inc.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP