Experience
MHL TEK, LLC
Hyundai Motor Co.; Kia Motors Corp.
In a unanimous opinion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that MHL Tek LLC did not own three Tire Pressure Monitoring System patents, resulting in a victory for Finnegan clients Hyundai Motor Company and Kia Motors Company and other automobile maker co-defendants. Specifically, the Federal Circuit (1) affirmed the Eastern District of Texas court’s holding that MHL Tek lacks standing to assert two of the three patents-in-suit, and (2) reversed the court’s holding that MHL Tek has standing to assert the third patent-in-suit.
MHL TEK, LLC v. Hyundai Motor Co.; Kia Motors Corp., 10-1287, -1317, -1318, Fed. Cir., Judges Newman, Mayer, Bryson
MHL TEK, LLC v. Hyundai Motor Co.; Kia Motors Corp., 2:07-cv-00516; 2:07-cv-00289, E.D. Tex., E.D. Tex., Judges Ward, Folsom, Gilstrap
Federal Circuit rules in favor of Finnegan client in radial arm saw guard patent case
Michael S. Powell
Eli Lilly and Company
Eastern District of Texas invalidates patent asserted against Finnegan client FedEx Corporation
FedEx Corp.
Federal Circuit rules in favor of Finnegan client InterDigital in appeal from ITC case
InterDigital Communications Corp.
District court enters judgment of noninfringement for Finnegan client Philips
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
American Vehicular Sciences v. Hyundai and Kia
Hyundai; Kia
Sun Pharmaceutical Inds. v. Eli Lilly and Co.
Eli Lilly and Company
Federal Circuit reverses ITC finding in favor of Finnegan client John Mezzalingua Associates
John Mezzalingua Associates, Inc.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.