直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

District court grants summary judgment in favor of AstraZeneca finding invalid all asserted claims against anti-cholesterol drug Crestor®

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.

AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granted summary judgment of patent invalidity due to prior invention thereby terminating an action that Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. brought against firm clients AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and several other AstraZeneca entities.  Teva alleged that its patent covered AstraZeneca’s blockbuster anti-cholesterol drug, Crestor®, and sought damages and fees.  AstraZeneca moved for summary judgment of invalidity due to its prior invention of the Crestor® formulation.  Judge William H. Yohn, Jr. found that AstraZeneca had invented first and had not abandoned, suppressed, or concealed its invention.  Accordingly, Judge Yohn invalidated all asserted claims of Teva’s patent and entered judgment in AstraZeneca’s favor.

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, 2:08-cv-04786, E.D. Pa., Judge Yohn

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, 11-1091, Fed. Cir., Judges Dyk, Linn, Rader

Related Professionals

Eric J. Fues
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4245
Email

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Pretrial Strategies

Branded Hatch-Waxman (ANDA) Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

Life Sciences

Pharmaceutical

Related Experiences

The Hillman Group, Inc. v. KeyMe, LLC

The Hillman Group, Inc.

Defeating a motion for preliminary injunction in the Western District of Texas

Cosentino SA et al

CMC Materials, LLC v. Dupont de Nemours, Inc. et al.

Dupont de Nemours, Inc. et al.

Bright Data Ltd. v. NetNut Ltd.

NetNut Ltd.

American Regent, Inc. v. Pharmacosmos Therapeutics Inc. et al.

American Regent, Inc.

Daedalus Blue LLC v. SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd. et al.

SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd. et al.

Delta Faucet Company v. Globe Union Industrial Corp. et al.

Globe Union Industrial Corp.

Regenxbio, Inc. et al. v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. et al.

Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. et al.

Eureka Database Solutions, LLC v. Nexidia, Inc.

Nexidia, Inc.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP