直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Finnegan client FedEx defeats Ronald Katz’s 11 year licensing litigation

Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P.

FedEx Corp.

Ronald A. Katz filed suit against Finnegan client FedEx in the Eastern District of Texas (E.D. Tex.), asserting 16 patents against FedEx automated telephone systems, including telephone service for scheduling pickups. Within one year, the suit was transferred to the Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) as part of a multidistrict litigation (MDL), as Katz had filed more than 50 lawsuits in three jurisdictions, asserting patents having nearly 2,000 claims against more than 150 companies. During the MDL, FedEx won on summary judgment, but the Federal Circuit reversed the win in part, and in doing so gave birth to the so-called “Katz Exception” for means plus function claims. The case returned to the C.D. Cal. for the judge to consider issues following the remand. Once the MDL issues were resolved, the case returned to the E.D. Tex., eight years after the transfer. Judge Gilstrap then transferred the case to the Western District of Tennessee (W.D. Tenn.). At Katz’s urging, roughly two months before trial, Judge McCalla stayed the case as FedEx challenged the remaining patent at issue in an ex parte reexamination. Katz received two final rejections in the reexamination, including an appeal decided by the Patent Trials and Appeal Board (PTAB), ending the case that lasted over a decade.

Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. v. FedEx Corp., 2:06-cv-00334, E.D. Tex., Judges Folsom, Gilstrap

FedEx Corp. v. Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P., 2:07-CV-02196, C.D. Cal., Judges Klausner, Mumm, Quinn

FedEx Corp. v. Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P., 2:07-ml-01816, C.D. Cal., Judges Klausner, Mumm

FedEx Corp. v. Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P., CBM2015-00053, PTAB, Judges Busch, Cocks, Wormmeester

FedEx Corp. v. Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P., Ex Parte Reexamination No. 90/013,586, USPTO, Judge Ralis

Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. v. FedEx Corp., 2:15-cv-02329, W.D. Tenn., Judges McCalla, Pham

FedEx Corp. v. Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P., 09-1450, -1451, -1452, -1468, -1469; 10-1017, Fed. Cir., Judges Bryson, Lourie, Newman

Related Professionals

Jeffrey A. Berkowitz
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2710
Email
Gerald F. Ivey
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4110
Email
John M. Williamson
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4282
Email
Elliot C. Cook
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2738
Email
J. Derek McCorquindale
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2768
Email

Related Practices

Appeals from the PTAB

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions

Licensing, Pooling, and Other Transactions

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Ex Parte Reexamination (EPR)

Related Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology

Electrical and Computer Technology

Related Experiences

FedEx granted summary judgment in multi-district litigation resolving all claims against Katz

FedEx Corp.

Lochner Technologies LLC v. Toshiba America, Inc.

Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.

Wyeth v. Wockhardt Limited

Wyeth

Litigation successes pave the way to settlement for leader in LED technology

Seoul Semiconductor

Patent infringement claims against FedEx dismissed

FedEx Corp.

Philips protected against antitrust and misuse charges in DVD and CD infringement litigation

U.S. Philips Corp.

Finnegan achieves trademark victory on laches for MMA Team Quest gyms

Matthew Lindland; Team Quest Fight Club LLC

Ablaise, Ltd. v. Navteq Corp.

FedEx Corp.

Eastern District of Texas invalidates patent asserted against Finnegan client FedEx Corporation

FedEx Corp.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP