直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Eastern District of Texas invalidates patent asserted against Finnegan client FedEx Corporation

FedEx Corp.

Judge Leonard Davis of the Eastern District of Texas issued an order granting judgment in FedEx’s favor and invalidating claims of a patent asserted by BarTex Research, LLC.  BarTex alleged that FedEx’s shipping labels infringed its patent related to bar codes.  FedEx won a favorable claim construction ruling by Magistrate Judge John Love that was later adopted by Judge Davis.  Thereafter BarTex conceded that the asserted claims were invalid in view of the claim construction.  While FedEx’s motion for summary judgment of invalidity was pending before Judge Davis, BarTex requested that Judge Davis issue an order granting judgment in favor of FedEx on the invalidity grounds raised in FedEx’s summary judgment motion.  The judgment in favor of FedEx was upheld on appeal by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.  Finnegan also represents FedEx Corporation in an inter partes reexamination of the same BarTex patent.  Although the reexamination has not yet concluded, the Patent Office has rejected all claims of BarTex’s patent.

BarTex Research, LLC v. FedEx Corp., 10-1397, Fed. Cir., Judges Newman, Schall, Linn

BarTex Research LLC v. FedEx Corp., 6:07-cv-00385, E.D. Tex., Judges Davis, Love

Related Professionals

Christopher T. Blackford
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4027
Email

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Ex Parte Reexamination (EPR)

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Pretrial Strategies

Related Industries

Electrical and Computer Technology

Related Experiences

Finnegan client FedEx defeats Ronald Katz’s 11 year licensing litigation

FedEx Corp.

Non-practicing entity Loramax dismisses case against Finnegan client FedEx

FedEx Corp.

District court enters judgment of noninfringement for Finnegan client Philips

Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.

Federal Circuit rules in favor of Finnegan clients Hyundai and Kia in a tire pressure monitoring system patent case

Hyundai Motor Co.; Kia Motors Corp.

Finnegan obtains jury verdict of non-infringement for longtime client FedEx

FedEx Corp.

Federal Circuit confirms last IV patent at issue in E.D. Tex. Trial invalid

FedEx Corp.

NPE Catharon dismisses case against FedEx in the face of two IPRs

FedEx Corp.

Directed verdict on behalf of defendants in the Eastern District of Texas

ADT Security Systems, Inc. and Digital Security Controls, Ltd.

District court grants summary judgment in favor of AstraZeneca finding invalid all asserted claims against anti-cholesterol drug Crestor®

AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP